My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:258
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2005 12:13:13 PM
Creation date
9/15/2005 4:44:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:258
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />driveways. The front yard landscaping for the proposed units along Peters Avenue would <br />include lawns with one-to-two ornamental trees and shrubs, similar to other homes in this <br />area. <br />While staff would prefer that the existing heritage California black walnut tree at the rear <br />of the site be preserved, this would not be feasible due to its location on the site. The <br />Planning Commission stated that the applicant should pay into the City's heritage tree <br />fund to compensate for the removal of this tree. However, staff believes that the <br />applicant is mitigating the loss of this tree along with the other eight trees by the <br />proposed replacement tree planting and that payment into the tree fund should not be <br />required. Staff notes that the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance does not require <br />payment into the fund for trees permitted to be removed as part of new development It <br />has been determined by the City's Landscape Architect that it is infeasible to relocate this <br />tree due to its size and age, that the tree would likely be a hazard if kept in the existing <br />location due to its great size, and that it is a very messy tree in an urban setting. Mr. <br />Winter has been looking for an interested party who might be interested in using the <br />wood from this tree for special projects. <br />As conditioned, the applicants would be required to create a maintenance association to <br />maintain the front yard landscaping at the single-family detached units and all <br />landscaping at the multi-family residential units. <br />General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan Land Use Conformity <br />The General Plan land use designation for the subject site is High Density Residential <br />(greater than eight dwelling units per gross acre). The proposed project, with six units on <br />a 0.26 acre site results in 23 dwelling units per acre, consistent with the General Plan <br />designation. The project would also be consistent with the following General Plan policy <br />in the Housing Element, "at a minimum, maintain the amount of high-density residential <br />acreage currently designated on the General Plan Map". As stated, the project's small unit <br />sizes creates an opportunity for "affordable by design" ownership housing, another <br />objective of the Housing Element. <br />The Downtown Specific Plan designation for the property is High Density Residential. <br />The project is consistent with the following Downtown Specific Plan land use <br />designation and the following policies: <br /> . Encourage development at densities which generally <br /> exceed the General Plan range midpoints in order to <br /> enhance the opportunities for affordable housing, <br /> unique housing types, and economic growth in the <br /> Downtown. <br />SR:05:258 <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.