My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:258
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2005 12:13:13 PM
Creation date
9/15/2005 4:44:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:258
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />homes would have the same design elements; he suggested that the roof pitches be varied <br />somewhat. He encouraged the design to be more home-like, rather than just a house. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Arkin about whether Larry Cannon reviewed this <br />project, Ms. Decker replied that this application was not peer-reviewed, although several <br />iterations of the materials and elevations were reviewed. She noted that there was variation in <br />the fa~ade treatment. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Arkin on whether the Housing Commission <br />examined such infill projects for affordable housing and whether it considered this particular <br />project, Ms. Decker replied that this particular project was not required to have inclusionary <br />housing and that it met the affordability-by-design criterion. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that she liked this design, especially the symmetry and variation in <br />housing materials, and that she would support this project. <br />Chairperson Maas noted that she did not object to the tandem parking and was concerned about <br />the loss of sky view. <br />Commissioner Blank expressed concern about density and believed the home designs were not <br />distinct enough for his taste. <br />Commissioner Roberts believed that the roof slopes were too similar, and she did not like the <br />carport at the duplex. <br />Chairperson Maas suggested that the item be continued so the applicant may work with staffto <br />fine-tune the issues and design. <br />Commissioner Maas moved to continue this item and refer it to staff for further <br />modification. <br />Commissioner Blank seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Arkin expressed concern about the number of homes on a quarter-acre lot. He <br />would support a peer review of this project. <br />Chairperson Maas agreed that a peer review would be beneficial. <br />Commissioner Blank agreed with Commissioner Roberts' sensitivity toward affordable or <br />achievable housing, which may be gained by using altemative designs. He believed the roof <br />slopes and duplex parking should be examined more closely. He believed the garages should be <br />set for parking only and that any trees that are destroyed should be replaced in addition to the <br />payment of a mitigation fee. <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that she had spoken to Mike Fulford about the black walnut, and <br />Mr. Fulford stated that while the tree could be trimmed, the black walnuts near California <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, May 11,2005 Page 4 of5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.