My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:258
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2005 12:13:13 PM
Creation date
9/15/2005 4:44:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:258
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Staff has added a condition of approval to address mitigations (#2-#3) requested by the PDA. <br />Instead of adding a specific time-limit restriction on parking in front of the project (mitigation <br /># 1 requested by the PDA), staff added the two following conditions of approval: <br />~ "After the project is occupied, if issues arise regarding on-street parking fronting the project, the <br />property owner(s) of the lot(s) shall meet with City staff and the Pleasanton Downtown <br />Association to resolve on-street parking issues." <br />~ "Residents living in the project are encouraged to park on-site in their driveways or on-site <br />parking spaces. On each of the single-family detached lots, there are three on-site parking spaces <br />available. The on-street spaces fronting the project are not reserved for residents or any <br />particular property or use." <br />Staff notes that there are no residential areas in the City where residents are restricted from <br />parking in the public parking spaces in front of their homes, unless the residents themselves <br />requested this restriction. For example, there is permit parking by the high schools, but it was <br />the residents who live there who requested this. Staff also notes that as a mitigation measure, <br />the applicant is paying an In Lieu Parking Fee for the project, although one is not required per <br />the Pleasanton Municipal Code. <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Notice of this application was sent to all property owners living within 1,000 feet of the subject <br />property . <br />Neighborhood Meeting <br />On December 7, 2005, staff met with Ron Winter and neighbors who had expressed a concern <br />about the project to staff. At the meeting, several issues were discussed: carports vs. garages; <br />the desire for more on-street parking; and the similarity of dwelling unit design. At the end of <br />the meeting, it was generally believed that carports would be acceptable with the meeting <br />attendees, the on-street parking issue needed to be further discussed, and the design of the units <br />were too similar. To address comments made at this meeting and comments by the PDA, the <br />applicants removed a unit from the plans, added one more on-site parking space, propose to pay <br />an in lieu parking fee, and have revised the design of the units such that the building <br />facades/roof treatments are not identical. <br />Public Comments <br />At the time this staff report was written, staff had received letters and verbal comments in regard <br />to the project. Comments received to date are noted below. <br />1. Robert Byrd, 480 St. Mary Street, Pleasanton. With the initial house plan submittal, he <br />commented that he would like to see more diversity in the design of the project. He <br />Case No. PUD-37 Planning Commission <br />Page - 20 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.