My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:259
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2005 12:13:11 PM
Creation date
9/15/2005 4:27:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:259
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. , , .. <br /> <br />31. Construction of the proposed project could result in the disturbance <br />of active raptor nests, which are protected under California State <br />fish and Game rCSFG) Code Section Code Section 3503.5. If <br />grading is to begin during the raptor nesting season (February I to <br />August 31), a focused survey for raptor nests shall be conducted by a <br />qualified biologist during the nesting season. The survey shall be <br />conducted no less than fourteen (14) days, and no more than thirty <br />(30) days, prior to the beginning of grading and/or tree removal. If <br />nesting raptors are found during the focused survey, no grading or <br />tree removal shall occur within five hundred feet (500' 0") of an <br />active nest until the young have fledged - as determined by a <br />qualified biologist - or until the project developer receives written <br />permission from CSfG personnel to proceed. The written findings <br />of the biologist shall be provided to the Planning Director within <br />thirty (30) days of the start of grading. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />32. The project developer shall submit the improvement plans, tract <br />grading plans. and building permit construction plans to Ralph <br />Osterling Consultants, Inc. for review in order to determine that site- <br />specific measures required to preserve the existing trees designated <br />for preservation during construction are being implemented with the <br />plans. The consultant's comments shall be submitted to the Planning <br />Director and to the City's Landscape Architect and shall be <br />incorporated onto the final site plans. grading plans, improvement <br />plans. etc., prior to issuance of a grading, on-site, and/or building <br />permits. No tree-trimming and/or pruning would occur unless <br />supervised by a horticultural consultant. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />33. The project developer shall arrange for the consultant to conduct a <br />field inspection of the construction site(s) prior to issuance of <br />grading permits to ensure that all pre-construction recommendations <br />have been properly implemented. The consultant shall then certify <br />in writing to the Planning Director that the recommendations have <br />been followed prior to start of construction. <br /> <br />34. For the existing trees that would be located on private lots, the <br />project developer shall record a disclosure/deed restriction on the lot <br />stating that the existing trees on these lots are to be preserved and <br />maintained by the homeowner. The disclosure/deed restriction shall <br />state the measures to be employed by the homeowner to preserve <br />these trees, e.g., not planting turf beneath the drip line/canopy of an <br />existing oak tree. The disclosures/deed restriction shall also describe <br />the permit procedures for removing any existing tree. The <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Conditions of Approval. PUD-5. Centex Homes' Apperson Ridge <br />Page [6 <br /> <br />June 5. 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.