My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:240
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:240
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2007 4:38:17 PM
Creation date
8/24/2005 4:39:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/30/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:240
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rose Avenue Extension <br /> <br />The 1996 General Plan roadway network assumed that between the years 2000 and 2005 <br />Rose Avenue would be extended through to Valley Avenue as a 2-lane road with a two- <br />way left turn lane. The 1996 General Plan also shows the intersection of Valley Avenue <br />and Rose Avenue as a future traffic signal-controlled intersection. The General Plan also <br />contains an express program to "diligently pursue" this extension by "all available <br />means" (Program 4.7). Both Alternatives B and C include this extension. <br /> <br />This extension has been studied directly several times, both as a response to Division <br />Street residents' requests and as part of development reviews for projects along the east- <br />west portion of Rose Avenue. These reviews showed value in this street in reducing <br />Division St./Black Ave. traffic, but its main value was in providing local access to the <br />then-underdeveloped area. The Nolan Farm project constructed Rose Ave. as a two-lane <br />street with traffic-calming/access-providing traffic circles rather than the turn lane <br />configuration shown in the General Plan. Rose Avenue at its easterly end is a longer cul- <br />de-sac than normally allowed; emergency access via the Fairgrounds is controlled by the <br />Fair Board. <br /> <br />This street extension is likely to be funded by a combination of direct developer and City <br />funds, depending on proposed densities of remaining undeveloped land, selected route, <br />and Alameda County participation. Extending Rose Avenue adds another east / west <br />link to the downtown and southerly Del Prado / Pleasanton Valley areas. It would aR'act <br />trips otherwise using Bernal - Pleasanton Avenue - Division Street / Rose Avenue, <br />Hansen Drive, Crestline Road, and Black Avenue. It could increase traffic on Del Valle <br />Parkway. <br /> <br />This street extension would reduce miles traveled on other collector streets, reduce total <br />miles traveled, and reduce total driving times throughout the City. Regional cut-through <br />trips would not be attracted to this route; however, it would be attractive to users outside <br />the immediate Rose Avenue vicinity. Note that while Fair Street (Rose Avenue's <br />connector to Hopyard - Pleasanton Ave.) has homes fronting on it, all new homes in the <br />Rose Ave. extension area are oriented onto side streets. Also note that Pleasanton <br />Avenue and Division Street carry far more traffic than their neighborhood collector <br />design would justify. <br /> <br />Stoneridge Drive Extension <br /> <br />The 1996 General Plan roadway network assumed the extension and widening of <br />Stoneridge Drive as a 6-lane roadway to El Charro between the years 2000 and 2005. <br />Alternative C includes this extension. It is left out of Alternative B. <br /> <br />Stoneridge Drive easterly of Hacienda Park was added to the General Plan in the 1980's <br />when West Las Positas was seen as inappropriate for through traffic, based on its <br />design/orientation to houses, and a replacement roadway connecting the business parks <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.