My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:235
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:235
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2005 11:12:35 AM
Creation date
8/12/2005 8:30:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/16/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:235
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"miscellaneous" employees (i.e., all other public agency employees) are to be retired on <br />disability is vested in the administration of the Public Employees Retirement System itself <br />(subject to the determination being appealed either by the public agency of by the employee.) <br />The City Council has delegated the authority to make these determinations as to safety members <br />to the City Manager by a resolution adopted in 1979. <br /> <br />The determination as to whether an employee could be retired on disability is whether the <br />employee is substantially precluded from performing the duties of the classification. There was <br />disagreement, however, in the courts whether this meant substantially precluded from the <br />performing the duties of the particular department where the person was employed or <br />substantially precluded from performing the duties of the classification for any public agency <br />department. <br /> <br />Recently, the California Supreme Court held that a public agency not only has to establish that <br />the employee is substantially precluded from performing his/her usual duties of the employee's <br />classification, but also that the employee must be substantially precluded from performing the <br />usual duties of the classification for other California public agencies in CalPERS as well. In other <br />words, if it is determined that a safety member who is incapacitated from performing the duties <br />of his/her current position can still perform the usual duties of his/her position for other agencies <br />and similar positions with similar benefits are available, the member would not qualify for <br />disability retirement. <br /> <br />Because of this ruling, CalPERS has initiated new requirements relating to these retirements and <br />is requiting cities to revise their resolutions that delegated the decision making authority to the <br />city manager to reflect these new requirements. <br /> <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> <br /> The change here is a minor one. As described above, the resolution will authorize the City <br /> Manager not only to determine whether the employee is substantially precluded from <br /> performing the duties of the position and to determine whether the disability is industrial (i.e., <br /> work related) or not, but also to determine that the disability precludes the employee from <br /> performing similar duties for another CalPERS agency. <br /> <br /> The procedures involved in these determinations will not change. If there is a disagreement as <br /> to whether the employee is disabled, there is an evidentiary hearing by a neutral hearing officer <br /> who makes a recommendation to the city manager. Disputes concerning whether the disability <br /> is work related or not will continue to be resolved by the Workers Compensation Appeals <br /> Board. <br /> <br /> SR:05:235 <br /> Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.