My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:232
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:232
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2005 11:12:35 AM
Creation date
8/12/2005 8:18:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/16/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:232
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
don't have the pipelines and have the treatment capacity, you still cannot get the water across the <br />Valley. The answer is more surface water, better hydraulics and possibly coordinated deliveries <br />to all of the retail agencies <br /> <br />Mr. Cusenza stated he believes the hydraulics and the piping system need to be looked at and <br />coordinated with the well system and how that is operated by the Zone. Zone 7 is planning the <br />Altamont treatment plant which will be a huge benefit but it is 4-5 years away. A short-term <br />look at operations is needed to minimize the groundwater and in the long term maybe a pipe is <br />needed to deliver the water to the Westside of the Valley. <br /> <br />DSRSD Director Scannell asked if the existing and future wells were to be operated in a certain <br />way would it affect the water quality and how could that be done? Should the EIR be amended <br />before it is certified for the Well Master Plan or should there be an agreement with the Zone? <br />Mr. Cusanza stated that it would possibly be a combination of both. Acknowledgement in the <br />EIR that these wells may not be entirely for reliability and a recognition of some contract or <br />agreement as to how the new and existing wells will be operated in the short and long term <br />would also address those issues. <br /> <br />Pleasanton Councilmember Sullivan asked if these strategies need to be reflected in the EIR? <br />Mr. Cusenza answered yes. The EIR is narrow based on the history of operating of the existing <br />wells and the experience on how these wells are used. There should be in some sort of <br />contractual understanding. <br /> <br />DSRSD Director Scannell asked Mr. Myers how the Zone could assure retailers that the wells <br />would be appropriately operated - amending the EIR or doing contract language. Mr. Myers <br />stated he does not feel there is a necessity to change the EIR as the Zone is doing exactly what is <br />being asked for on a daily basis now. <br /> <br /> DSRSD President Ford stated that no one is trying to operate the wells for Zone 7 but that he <br /> feels it is fair to ask for contracts and operating guidelines that can be enforced. A contract <br /> specifying minimum criteria should be entered into with Zone 7. If they are not met, there <br /> should be some sort of penalty tied to it. <br /> <br /> Zone 7 Director Marchand stated he was extremely offended and has concerns with the tone of <br /> Pleasanton's written staff report developed for this meeting. It implies that Zone 7 cannot be <br /> trusted and is incapable of planning, managing or operating the distribution system. He stated <br /> the Zone operates their system in the best interest of their constituents and the environment. <br /> Variations in water quality are a simple matter of geography which is beyond Zone 7's control. <br /> It is stated in the staff report that the westside of the Valley receives the majority of the well <br /> water with 2-3 times the hardness that the eastside does. It also states that the westside receives <br /> the majority of the taste and odor problems because they receive the majority of the softer <br /> aqueduct water. The staff report says it is getting both. Mr. Marchand stated that this is a <br /> physical impossibility. He stated his belief that the seven commitments in the staff report were <br /> an insult to Zone 7's integrity and commitment to its constituents. He also noted, despite <br /> Pleasanton's Water Quality Report, there does not seem to be any plan in place for Pleasanton to <br /> soften their wells to coincide with Zone 7 schedule. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.