Laserfiche WebLink
number, representing one space per 4.3 seats, is adequate to support the 450-seat new sanctuary <br />at Phase II construction and to avoid curbside parking on residential streets. <br /> <br />In response to the appellants' concern of curbside parking being used by people attending <br />Church functions, staff observed the parking pattern at St. Clare's on Sunday, May 22, 2005 <br />from 9:40 a.m. to 12:00 noon. People arriving for the 10:00 worship service traveled by <br />automobiles from Hopyard Road to Valley Trails Drive and used the on-site parking lot, except <br />for four vehicles that parked on Valley Trails Drive. The existing parking lot appears to meet the <br />parking demand for the regular Sunday worship services since no vehicles were observed to <br />circulate around the parking lot and then park on the street due to lack of on-site parking. Seven <br />on-site parking spaces were left unoccupied during the service. <br /> <br />During the observation time, there were two vehicles parked along the east side of National Park <br />Road, across from Sequoia Court. However, it was unclear if these two vehicles belonged to <br />St. Clare's members since they were still parked at the same locations when staff left the site at <br />12:00 noon. No vehicles arrived at St. Clare's from National Park Road. Three vehicles used <br />National Park Road after exiting St. Clare's parking lot. <br /> <br />The traffic pattern observed on the unannounced visit can be expected to be a typical pattern for <br />Sunday traffic at St. Clare's. With the proposed additional parking spaces to support the <br />expansion, staff would expect that a similar parking pattern would follow. <br /> <br />Parking Lot Expansion and Safetw <br /> <br />The area proposed for the parking lot expansion is currently vacant. The appellants stated that <br />using this area for parking "would be a visual blight to the surrounding neighborhoods as well as <br />a source of noise. It would have an extremely negative effect on the character of the <br />neighborhood." Additionally, the appellants stated that it would be safety concern if a wall were <br />constructed to screen the vehicles as undesired activities may occur behind the wall. <br /> <br /> Staff does not agree that having the parking on the north portion of St. Clare's site would <br /> necessarily be a visual blight. This parking area could be used as a buffer to separate the <br /> residential use on Bryce Canyon Court from the non-residential use on the St. Clare's site. <br /> Currently a solid fence and a public walkway separate the residences on Bryce Canyon Court <br /> from St. Clare's site. This solid fence would effectively block headlights. To mitigate the <br /> visual appearance of a parking lot, landscaping, such as dense shrubs, is often used to screen <br /> headlights from vehicles and soften the appearance of the parking area. The master expansion <br /> plan, as conditioned, would provide new landscaping along National Park Road to screen and <br /> buffer the new parking area. When the design review for Phase II is considered, staff will <br /> ensure that adequate landscaping is provided to create an attractive screen for the parking lot; <br /> Condition No. 3 addresses this requirement. <br /> <br /> SR:05:154 <br /> Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />