My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:196
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:196
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2005 11:40:38 AM
Creation date
7/14/2005 11:02:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:196
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, ALAMEDA <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 05 - <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT THE COSTS FOR WEED <br /> ABATEMENT, INCLUDING ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, <br /> ARE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AND LIEN IMPOSED ON <br /> THE PROPERTIES REQUIRING ABATEMENT AND <br /> APPROVING THE COST ACCOUNTING REPORT FOR <br /> THE 2005 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the weed abatement program of the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department is <br /> administered pursuant to Government Code sections 39560-39588; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, at its meeting of March 01, 2005, the City of Pleasanton City Council adopted <br /> Resolution No. 05-012, which declared as a public nuisance all weeds, rubbish or <br /> refuse upon or in front of certain described properties within the City of <br /> Pleasanton as more particularly set forth in Exhibit "A", attached thereto; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on April 05, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 05-017, which ordered <br /> the abatement of weeds on the parcels identified in Resolution No. 05-012 And <br /> declared that the weed abatement costs, including a 100% mark up charge for <br /> administrative costs, are the responsibility of the property owner; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, those properties that were not voluntarily abated by the property owners were <br /> abated a contractor for the City of Pleasanton; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, an itemized report, attached hereto as Exhibit A, showing the cost of weed <br /> abatement for each parcel was presented to the City Council at a public hearing on <br /> July 19, 2005; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, at the City Council meeting on July 19, 2005, no objections to the cost accounting <br /> report were made and the City approved the cost accounting report for the <br /> abatement program; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, section 39577 of the California Government Code provides that the abatement <br /> costs, including the administrative costs for enforcement, are recoverable and <br /> constitute a special assessment against the parcels that are abated; and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.