My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:128
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2005 11:25:33 AM
Creation date
7/14/2005 10:57:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/16/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:128
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />BACKGROUND <br />Medical Marijuana <br />California voters enacted Proposition 215, "The Compassionate Use Act of 1996" to <br />ensure that, without violating State laws regarding possession and cultivation of marijuana, <br />"seriously ill Californians have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical <br />purposes where the medical use is deemed appropriate and has been recommended by a <br />physician who has determined that the person's health would benefit from the use of <br />marijuana in the treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, <br />arthritis, migraine, or other illness for which marijuana provides relief." <br />Under the Act, patients and primary caregivers are not subject to state criminal prosecution for <br />cultivation and personal pos~ssion of marijuana; however, they are not allowed to distribute it <br />to others or sell it at a profit. Fundamentally, the Act protects personal medical use of <br />marijuana, but not commercial use. While recognizing the desires of the electorate in passing <br />this proposition, significant issues have arisen in its implementation. In 2003, the State <br />Legislature enacted Senate Bill 420 to provide some definitions and regulations related to <br />medical marijuana, including an identification card program, limits on the amount of marijuana <br />per qualified patient, and confidentiality and privacy restrictions. <br />However, issues remain, including the proliferation of medical marijuana "dispensaries" <br />claiming to serve as "primary caregivers" for large numbers of "patients," increasing <br />concentration of medical marijuana dispensaries in certain areas and secondary impacts of the <br />medical marijuana dispensaries, such as increased criminal activity, loitering, traffic and <br />parking. (see attached memorandum from Dublin Police Chief) <br />In addition, to date, there is no federal recognition of medical marijuana, causing <br />conflicts between enforcement of federal laws and state laws that will need to be ultimately <br />resolved through the court system. (see attached materials from the U.S. Drug Enforcement <br />Administration) The United States Supreme Court recently issued an opinion that Congress had <br />the constitutional authority to enforce federal prohibitions on marijuana use and cultivation, <br />despite California's law allowing personal medical use and cultivation of marijuana. A bill has <br />already been introduced into Congress to prohibit enforcement of federal laws related to <br />marijuana in those states that have decriminalized the use for medical purposes. It is clear that <br />these issues remain unsettled and that there will be further cases and laws related to medical <br />marijuana. <br />Urgencv Ordinance Imposing a Moratorium <br />California Government Code section 65858 provides statutory authority for interim <br />ordinances prohibiting uses that may conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan or <br />zoning proposal that the city is studying or plans to study. An interim ordinance--commonly <br />SR:05: 128 <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.