My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 05051
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
RES 05051
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 10:58:13 AM
Creation date
7/5/2005 10:44:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/21/2005
DOCUMENT NO
RES 05051
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENGINEER'S REPORT <br /> <br /> LANDSCAPE DISTRICT NO. 1984-1 <br /> CITY OF PLEASANTON, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> Philip A. Grubstick, City Engineer, Engineer for Landscape District No. 1984-1, City of Pleasanton, <br /> Alameda County, California, makes this report as directed by the City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the <br /> Streets and Hig3ways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). <br /> <br /> The improvements which are the subject of this Report are bhefly described as follows: <br /> <br /> 1. Landscaping, including trees, shrubs and irrigation system all as delineated on the landscape and <br /> irrigation plans for Tract 5257 (Phase III Landscape Distr/ct 1984-1). <br /> <br /> Said improvements are within the following areas: <br /> <br /> a. North of Corte de Flores on the west side of Paseo Santa Cruz approximately 160 feet <br /> long by 6 feet wide, and north of Corte Pacifica on the east side of Paseo Santa Cruz <br /> approximately 1,370 feet long by 6 feet wide. <br /> <br /> This Report consists of five parts, as follows: <br /> <br /> PART A Plans and specifications for the improvements constructed in 1985. <br /> <br /> PART B An estimate of the cost for maintenance of the existing improvements and proposed <br /> improvements. <br /> <br /> PART C An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvement on each benefited parcel of land <br /> within the Assessment District. <br /> <br /> PART D A statement descr/bing the method by which the mount proposed to be assessed against <br /> each parcel was determined. <br /> <br /> PART E An assessment diagram which shows each parcel of real property within the assessment <br /> district. This diagram is keyed to Part C by assessment diagram number. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Philip A. Gmbstick <br />City Engineer <br /> <br /> 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.