My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-94-43
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
PC-94-43
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:33 AM
Creation date
6/29/2005 3:46:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/31/1994
DOCUMENT NO
PC-94-43
DOCUMENT NAME
GP-94-01
NOTES
CITY OF PLEASANTON
NOTES 3
GPA: CLARIFY TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO SITE SPECIFIC TRAFFIC STUDIES FOR MAJOR DEVTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-94-43 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON FOR A GENERAL <br />PLAN AMENDMENT TO CLARIFY TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIREMENTS AS THEY <br />RELATE TO SITE SPECIFIC TRAFFIC STUDIES FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS <br />WHICH HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO EXCEED THE LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) <br />DESIGNATION OF "D" AS FILED tINDER CASE GP-94-01 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton has initiated a General Plan <br />Amendment to clarify traffic study requirements as they <br />relate to site specific traffic studies for major <br />developments which have the potential to exceed the Level <br />of Service (LOS) designation of "D"; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />at its meeting of <br />Commission received <br />Case GP-94-01; and <br /> <br />August 31, 1994, the Planning <br />a proposed negative declaration for <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the Planning commission has received <br />Initial study dated July 29, 1994, <br />recommendations of the staff; and <br /> <br />and reviewed the <br />and received the <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held at which time the <br />public was given the opportunity to comment on the <br />environmental impacts of the proposal; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the potential <br />impacts in accordance with the applicable state and local <br />guidelines governing the preparation of Negative <br />Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the Planning commission finds <br />proposed project would not have <br />effects on the environment; and <br /> <br />that approval of the <br />any significant adverse <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission further finds that the proposed <br />project would not have any adverse impacts on the site's <br />wildlife. <br /> <br />II II <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.