Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Resolution No. PC-94-12 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />The use would be located in a single-family <br />dwelling. The area is improved completely with <br />streets and sidewalks, and parking is permissible <br />along all streets in the immediate area. <br /> <br />The in-home electrolysis service would not be <br />detrimental to the pUblic, health, safety or <br />welfare. Although some additional vehicular or <br />pedestrian traffic may be created by the <br />applicant's clients, the hours of operation are <br />such that it would not interfere with the quiet <br />morning and evening hours normally associated with <br />residential districts. <br /> <br />No changes would be made <br />structure, and no part <br />conducted out of doors. <br /> <br />to the exterior of the <br />of the use would be <br /> <br />C. The proposed conditional use will comply with each <br />of the applicable provisions of this chapter. <br /> <br />The home occupation is required to comply with the <br />conditions stipulated in Chapter 18.104.30. As <br />conditioned, the in-home electrolysis service is in <br />compliance with the aforementioned section. <br />Granting a conditional use permit to Connie Harris <br />to operate an electrolysis service from her home is <br />consistent with the City I S ability to regulate <br />zoning as listed in Municipal Code section 18.124 <br />"Conditional Uses". <br /> <br />WHEREAS, projects of this nature are categorically exempt from the <br />requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed <br />conditional use, as conditioned, will be compatible with <br />the surrounding uses. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: <br /> <br />Section 1. Approves Case UP-94-09, the application of Connie <br />Harris for a non-exempt home occupation permit to operate <br />an in-home electrolysis service with a maximum of fifteen <br />clients per week, subject to the conditions shown on <br />Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made part of this case by <br />reference. <br /> <br />I I I <br />