My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-91-81
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
PC-91-81
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:34:13 AM
Creation date
6/15/2005 2:19:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/13/1991
DOCUMENT NO
PC-91-81
NOTES
EIR, EI MITIGATION OF MONITORING PROGRAM, CEQA FINDINGS, AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
NOTES 3
PREPARED FOR THE NORTH SYCAMORE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />creek banks (within Parcel 25) are implemented, <br />then site specific surveys for these species must <br />be conducted prior to any development approval <br />within Parcel 25. If the surveys are conducted and <br />find occurrence of these species, then habitat <br />restoration mitigation would be required as a <br />condition of development approval within Parcel 25. <br />When: Prior to tentative map and building permit <br />approval. <br />Who Verifies: Planning Department. <br /> <br />30. Consult with Army Corps of Engineers (page 124). <br /> <br />Who: Funding Developers and City of Pleasanton. <br />What: Consult with the Army Corps of Engineers during <br />preparation of the drainage improvement/creek <br />restoration plans as to the jurisdiction and <br />requirements of the Corps. <br />When: Prior to approval of final ,drainage <br />improvement/creek restoration plans. <br />Who Verifies: Planning Department in consultation with the Public <br />Works Department. <br /> <br />3l. Avoid or minimize loss of wetland habitat (page l24). <br /> <br />Who: <br />What: <br /> <br />Individual property owners. <br />Drainage improvements shall be designed <br />disturbance within potential wetland <br />Creek restoration associated with the. <br />natural channel shall provide no net <br />habitat at a minimum and should optimally <br />potential habitat area and value. <br />Prior to master drainage plan approval. <br />Planning Department. <br /> <br />to avoid <br />habitat. <br />improved <br />loss of <br />increase <br /> <br />When: <br />Who Verifies: <br /> <br />32. Comply with streambed alteration requirements (page l24) <br /> <br />When: <br />Who Verifies: <br /> <br />Funding Developers. <br />Receive a streambed Alteration permit from the <br />California Department of Fish and Game for drainage <br />improvements to creek channels. <br />Prior to City approval of drainage improvements. <br />Public Works Department. <br /> <br />Who: <br />What: <br /> <br />33. Design road crossings to minimize impacts (page l24). <br /> <br />Who : Individual Developers. <br />What: Any road crossing either drainage course shall be <br />designed to respect the integrity of the streambed. <br />The California Department of Fish and Game <br />recommends bridges rather than culverts. <br />When: Prior to permit approval for any road crossings. <br /> <br />- 10 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.