Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"- <br /> <br />MA TIERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> <br />1. Commissioner Horan said he felt a request he had made regarding the N. Sycamore Plan <br />had been misinterpreted. He clarified that he had stated that he wanted a sense of what the <br />property owners in that area desired. He did not want an extensive surveyor a whole new <br />look at the situation. Mr. Iserson said he would pass the information on to Wayne <br />Rasmussen. <br /> <br />2. Commissioner Hovingh noted that at the previous night's DRB meeting the application <br />for Spieker Partners addressed a request for two additional names of Ethan Allen and Galaxie <br />Theater on the Rose Pavilion pylon sign. There are already three names on the sign: Cost <br />Less, Simon's, and Long's. He said the vote was 5-0 against the application; however, <br />several of the Commissioners expressed a "soft" denial and told the applicant he could appeal <br />the decision to either the Planning Commission or City Council. <br /> <br />3. Commissioner Hovingh reported that DRB had also reviewed a request for a satellite dish <br />that had been installed without a permit on top of the Phillies Cheesesteak Restaurant at 310 <br />Main Street. The Board had approved the application on a 3-2 vote. Commissioner <br />Hovingh felt that approval was going to open up a proliferation of new requests for dishes in <br />the Downtown area, and also felt they were going against a set policy on satellite dishes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan commented that he serves on the Downtown committee and was not <br />sure how satellite dishes would be addressed as to improvement and historic restoration of <br />the Downtown area. Commissioner Hovingh and Chairman Mahern both noted they could <br />see the dish while driving by. Commissioner Horan subsequently made a request to appeal <br />the Design Review Board decision for Case Z-91-93. Commissioner Hovingh concurred <br />with the request. For the record, Commissioner Horan felt the request should be in <br />conformance because of the untold efforts of the Downtown Task Force to get such <br />circumstances into conformance, as it is in the process of suggesting design criteria for <br />Downtown. <br /> <br />4. Chairman Mahern asked staff whether Mr. Iserson had information regarding Brandt <br />" Esser's letter of complaint about abandoned property at 346 W. Angela Street. Mr. Iserson <br />replied that he did not have this information, but would discuss it with Mr. Swift. <br /> <br />5. Commissioner Horan called attention to a drive-thru Video Store and asked about the <br />development review process. Mr. Iserson said this site went through the Design Review <br />Board only as a new structure. He thought this was zoned as C-C (Community Commercial <br />or straight zoning) and was not a PUD. Under these requirements it goes only to Design <br />Review Board. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commission September 25, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />. <br />