Laserfiche WebLink
<br />changed to comfortably fit the available square footage. He <br />concluded that he could not support the variance. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Hovingh, seconded by <br />Commissioner Michelotti that the findings cannot be made and <br />denying Case AP-91-3. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />commissioners Hovingh, Michelotti, and Wright <br />Commissioner McGuirk and Chairman Mahern <br />commissioner Horan <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-91-45 was entered and adopted denying Case AP- <br />91-3 as motioned. <br /> <br />The applicant was informed he has 15 days in which to appeal the <br />decision to city Council. <br /> <br />PR-91-2, Niles Canvon Railwav Extension <br />Review and recommendation of the preliminary proposal by Ed <br />Churka (Coffee Roast Express) to extend the Niles canyon Railway <br />(steam tourist railroad operated by the Pacific Locomotive <br />Association) from Niles canyon along the former Southern Pacific <br />Railroad right-of-way into Downtown Pleasanton. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Continued to 7/10/91. <br /> <br />MATTERS INITIATED FOR COMKISSION'S REVIEW <br /> <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br />No action required. <br /> <br />B. Actions of the City Council <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />C. Actions of the Design Review Board <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />D. Design Review Process FOllOW-Up Report <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern stated that she is pretty much in agreement with <br />the recommendations set forth in the report. She felt the big <br />item for discussion was whether a Planning commissioner should be <br />a member of the Design Review Board; if so, should they have <br />voting privileges. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning co..ission <br />JUDe 26, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br />