Laserfiche WebLink
the design review for project. In conclusion, she noted she would support approval of the <br />application. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Maas, seconded by Chairperson Roberts, finding <br />that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment; approving the <br />attached draft Negative Declaration; making the PUD findings be made for the proposed <br />development plan as listed in the staff report; and, recommending approval of Case <br />PUD-99-01, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B," including deletion of Condition <br />No. 88, preservation of Condition No. 89, and modifications to Condition No. 139. Further, <br />that additional conditions be added that fencing should be reviewed at the design review <br />process with as much open fencing as possible; that the Commission will review the design <br />of the twelve homes to ensure individualness and consistency with the west side as well as a <br />blend with the east side of Foothill Road; that street lighting include a more country <br />design; that the median strip on Foothill Road as conditioned for the applicant be further <br />landscaped south at the expense of the City and the School District; that additional details <br />be provided on the regular gate and the cattle gate; and that an open offer of dedication <br />based on the Park District's timing be considered in conjunction with any other future <br />amenities with no guarantees on future development. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Kameny, Maas, and Chairperson Roberts <br />NOES: Commissioner Sullivan <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Kumaran <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-99-64 and -65 were entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br /> EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING M1NUTES, September 8, 1999 Page 6 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />