My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 01/12/1994
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
PC 01/12/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 2:34:26 PM
Creation date
6/2/2005 10:28:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/12/1994
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 01/12/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Finch, Mr. Swift stated that although there are many policies <br />that will not need to be changed, these policies would nevertheless need to be reviewed in the <br />process of updating the General Plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti commended the individual(s) responsible for integrating the public's <br />concerns into an outline as well as for all backup materials. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Michelotti, Mr. Swift stated that the Council had charged the <br />Steering Committee to come up with the land use plan that would then be given to the <br />Assembly for review and modifications. The Steering Committee's intent is to place the Plan <br />before the Planning Commission and the City Council for approval. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mahern wondered if it would be beneficial for each Commissioner to focus on <br />a specific subcommittee (i.e., become the "subcommittee expert"). <br /> <br />Commissioner Mahern indicated that she would like to keep updated on the progress of the <br />subcommittees but would not want to get involved in their decision-making process. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh thought it would be better to wait until the end of the General Plan <br />process to make suggestions. Commissioner Wright stated, however, that suggestions should <br />be made during the General Plan process so these suggestions are acted upon. <br /> <br />Chairman McGuirk inquired if the Commission would like to get the input from staff <br />regarding the subcommittees' findings for its internal discussion. The Commissioners <br />agreed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti inquired if any Commissioner would be interested in attending a <br />subcommittee meeting. Commissioner Mahern stated that each subcommittee's material is <br />voluminous, and while each Commissioner would get all the materials, each Commissioner <br />could focus on one subcommittee's material so the Commission would be prepared at the <br />Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Wright thought that would be too limiting to <br />the Commissioners. Commissioner Hovingh stated he felt if each Commissioner focused on <br />one area, they would become trapped in that one component. <br /> <br />It was agreed by the Commissioners to put on the next meeting's agenda a time to discuss <br />their decision regarding the General Plan Steering Committee. Chairman McGuirk would <br />like to go forward and see what is given to them and decide later how they want to approach <br />the subcommittees. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift asked the Commission if there was any interest to create a subcommittee that <br />would work with staff on items that they anticipate to be on their work program for the next <br />six months. The Commission agreed to this idea. Mr. Swift will bring a report of the items <br />staff would like Commission input on to the next meeting. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />January 12, 1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.