PC 08/11/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. MacDonald noted that another issue of concern is Condition 1 ,regarding storm drain lines. The applicant would like to either delete the last sentence or add to the end of the sentence "to the extent this is consistent with the Fish and Game D ment. " ,- In response to Commissioner Michelotti's question concerning driv way access to Foothill Road, Mr. Swift indicated that originally lots directly abutted the ri ht of way. Current configuration has an open space buffer between the lots and the r . Staff would like the final map to show the buffer with no access. Staff feels that Dr. G enn's access is covered by Condition 5. Mr. Swift would like to modify Condition 27 to Y "any new lots" will not have access to Foothill Road and leave Condition 5 unchanged. . MacDonald stated that he would agree with the modifIcation to Condition 27. Commissioner Hovingh questioned the urgency of approving the Te tative Map and asked if the Planning Commission could act on the Tentative Map after the ity Council has made a determination on the PUD. Mr. MacDonald indicated that any sig fIcant change to the PUD at the Council level must be referred back to the Planning Co mission. Mr. Swift noted that the Tentative Map approval is contingent upon PUD appr val. Dr. David Glenn, 5650 Foothill Road, indicated he has no problem with the development except with his easement. He referenced a letter dated March 23, 1 93, (copies of which were provided to the Planning Commission this evening) which refe to a legal document issued by the Alameda County Superior Court, dated March 22, 19 3, granting him easement over the Moller property from Foothill Road via a securi gate on Foothill Road. Dr. Glenn would like to have easement "relocated" to a location as stablished in legal documents. He advised that the Mollers don't want to agree to the hange. ~ Dr. Glenn stated that he believes there are no signifIcant traffIc safe y issues related to the easement onto Foothill Road. He believes his usage is not hazardo s. He feels he is being inconvenienced if he must drive south on Foothill to Muirwood to ake a U-turn in order to head into Dublin. In response to Commissioner Michelotti's question, Dr. Glenn stat that his main objection is the inconvenience to him. Mr. Swift stated that there is a proposed median in Foothill Road d staff will not support a break in the median to allow a left turn out of that easement locatio if the Planning Commission leaves the easement in as part of the approval. Dr. Glenn said that he would have to use B Court access if he were going toward Dublin, but coming back, he could use his easement access road. It would ut his inconvenience by 50%. Dr. Glenn would like to see a break in the median to allow a left turn. Dr. Glenn said he would like a security gate to keep the public out danger. He believes that anything that can be done to reduce fire warranted, and a security gate as far forward as possible would gr hazards. Planning Commission Minutes August 11, 1993 Page 6 us lessening the fire d is certainly y reduce the safety