My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/23/1993
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
PC 06/23/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2017 2:45:26 PM
Creation date
6/2/2005 9:40:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/23/1993
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/23/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,,- <br /> <br />~ PUD-93-1. Richard Pareio <br />Application for Planned Unit Development rezoning and develop ent plan approval 1) <br />to rezone an approximately 1.96 acre property from the A (Agric ltural) zoning district <br />to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) - LDR (Low Density R dential) District; and <br />2) for development plan approval for a two-lot single-family resi ential development <br />located at 2884 Foothill Road. Zoning for the property is Agricu tural, West Foothill <br />Road Corridor Overlay District. A negative declaration has bee prepared for this <br />project and will be considered at this hearing. <br /> <br />Continued to 7/14/93. <br /> <br />~ Canital Imnrovement PrOI!ralll <br />Review of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and cons deration of conformity <br />with the General Plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending the Planning Co mission find the Draft <br />Capital Improvement Program, as a whole and as individual projects consistent with the <br />General Plan; and that the Commission recommend as the priorities or funding those <br />projects identified in the Draft Program. He advised that Assistant ity Manager Steven <br />Bocian and Assistant Director of Public Works Roger Higdon were resent to respond to <br />questions. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright questioned the responsibility of the Planning <br />if the CIP is consistent with the General Plan in that the General P is being updated. Mr. <br />Swift noted that while policies and programs may be changed, it is n t likely that major <br />changes will be made because of existing development demands. H further noted that some <br />of the CIP projects are necessary as a result of approved developme t plans and that policies <br />coming out of the General Plan Update will impact future CIP's. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Michelotti's question regarding the use of General Pund money <br />for CIP projects, Mr. Swift advised that there are no restrictions for e use of General Fund <br />money for CIP projects. Mr. Bocian described the budget process' conjunction with the <br />development of the Pive- Year Capital Improvement Program and di ussed the use of <br />General Pund reserves. <br /> <br />Mr. Bocian responded to Commissioner Mahern's question related t <br />Governor's proposal to take money from the cities, and also discus <br />of increased sales tax. <br /> <br /> <br />the impact of the <br />the possible extension <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Pinch's question regarding the reductio in grants in 1994-95, <br />Mr. Bocian explained that because of the grant approval process the rt only reflects those <br />grants which we are relatively certain will be approved. He noted at the City will continue <br />to apply for grants and those that are approved will be reflected in ture CIP reports. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes June 23, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.