PC 01/27/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ ~ REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO TIlE AGENDA Mr. Swift requested that PUD-92-09, Walter and Corazon Panganib be continued to 2/10/93; GP-92-06, Kaiser Center be continued indefinitely; and RZ- 2-5, City of Pleasanton be withdrawn. The Commission agreed to this request. ~ MA TED BY I N Commissioner Finch called attention to the Laguna Oaks project on Foothill Road, and noted that a number of people have been four-wh 1 driving there. He asked staff when the project will begin construction and whether a fe ce will be put up around the project. Mr. Higdon stated they do not have a date as to hen construction will begin; the applicant does have a one-year extension for 1993. He ad ed that it is private property so it is up to the owner as to whether he wants to put up a fi nce or not. 5. Item 5.a. anton PUBLIC HEARINGS T 1 PI Commons) Application to subdivide an approximately 0.53 acre site into seve townhouse lots ranging in size from approximately 2,800 sq. ft. to 3,900 sq. ft. I ated at the southeast corner of Palomino Drive and Concord Street. Zoning for the pr perty is PUD (planned Unit Development) - High Density Residential District. Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Case ract 6601 subject to the conditions of the staff report. Commissioner Finch removed himself from the discussion because of a possible conflict of interest. Commissioner Wright questioned staff as to whether the driveway wo ld be of five-inch concrete on a four-inch aggregate base. Mr. Higdon deferred that qu stion to the applicant. Commissioner Michelotti asked staff whether they have received any uestions or concerns from City Council members. Mr. Swift replied that Councilmember om Pico had several concerns and questions about the Chu project. In response to Chairman Hovingh's question, Mr. Swift responded th t it is the intent of the project to be able to sell all the units to people in the lower income b cket. At the time of the PUD, it was thought that some of the units might be for lower or oderate income. What staff is trying to work out with Rotary is for 100 percent lower 'ncome, which is the way Council approved the exemption. This would put the units in th $110,000-115,000 range. They will attempt to build the units to sell at that price; if the cannot, then the issue of exemption will be reviewed again. Planning Commission Minutes January 27. 1993 Page 2