Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r- Item S.c. Tract 6593 (Chu/Gah....hmat) <br />Application to subdivide an approximately 77.8 acre site into 29 residential lots (single- <br />family detached and townhomes) and 18 common parcels, inelu ' g a five acre public <br />park site, a five acre elementary school site, and a remainder p I, located generally <br />at Martin Avenue south oC the Arroyo Mocho and east oC the ern terminus oC <br />Stoneridge Drive. Zoning for the property is PUD (planned U . Development) - LDR, <br />MDR, and PI (Low Density Residential, Medium Density Reside tial, and Public and <br />Institutional) District. <br /> <br />Continued to 1/27/93. <br /> <br />Item S.d. PUD-90-12. David C. .Tones <br />Application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval to one a one-acre parcel <br />Crom the Agricultural zoning district to the PUD - Medium De ty Residential District <br />and for PUD development plan approval Cor 3 +/- acres (2 ex' g parcels) of land for <br />a 9-unit single-family residential development located at 1605 R e Avenue. Zoning for <br />the property is n A n (Agricultural) District. A negative declarat on has been prepared <br />for this project and will be considered at this hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Ca PUD-9o-12 subject to <br />the conditions of the staff report. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh called staffs attention to Condition 33 on page 8, second to the last <br />sentence which referred to the method and manner for the provision of funds, and felt that it <br />was confusing. Mr. Swift replied that it can be reworded for c1arit . <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk questioned Mr. Swift in regard to the "rem ant" lots. Staff feels <br />these lots can be used more effectively by adding them onto the no erly acreage as opposed <br />to widening the nine lots under discussion. Mr. Swift went into so e detail in explaining the <br />situation. <br /> <br /> <br />eda County <br />ufficient. Mr. Swift <br />s consistent with the <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti expressed concern that with continued <br />Fairgrounds development that infrastructure in that area will not be <br />stated that this has been looked at very carefully and staff feels this <br />General Plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti also expressed concern that the project 10 are narrower than she <br />would have desired, and that she will be looking carefully at the set acks. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Mahern noted that her questions about the remnant I ts had been answered by <br />Mr. Swift. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh noted for the record that he had met with the ap licant. <br /> <br />Planning Commissioo Minute. January 13, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />