Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ Item 5.c. Tract 6593 CChu/GahrahmaO <br />Application to subdivide an approximately 77.8 acre site into 2 5 residential lots (single- <br />family detached and townhomes) and 18 common parcels, incl ding a five acre public <br />park site, a five acre elementary school site, and a remainder el, located generally <br />at Martin Avenue south of the Arroyo Mocho and east of the ern terminus of <br />Stoneridge Drive. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned U .t Development) _ LDR, <br />MDR, and PI (Low Density Residential, Medium Density Resid ntial, and Public and <br />Institutional) District. <br /> <br />Continued to 1/27/93. <br /> <br />Item S.d. PUD-90-12. David C. .Tones <br />Application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval to one a one-acre parcel <br />from the Agricultural zoning district to the PUD - Medium De ity Residential District <br />and for PUD development plan approval for 3 +/- acres (2 . ing parcels) of land for <br />a 9-unit single-family residential development located at 1605 R Avenue. Zoning for <br />the property is · A. (Agricultural) District. A negative declarat on has been prepared <br />for this project and will be considered at this hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Ca PUD-90-l2 subject to <br />the conditions of the staff report. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh called staffs attention to Condition 33 on page 8, second to the last <br />sentence which referred to the method and manner for the provision of funds, and felt that it <br />was confusing. Mr. Swift replied that it can be reworded for clarit . <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk questioned Mr. Swift in regard to the "rem ant" lots. Staff feels <br />these lots can be used more effectively by adding them onto the no erly acreage as opposed <br />to widening the nine lots under discussion. Mr. Swift went into so e detail in explaining the <br />situation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti expressed concern that with continued AI eda County <br />Fairgrounds development that infrastructure in that area will not be s fficient. Mr. Swift <br />stated that this has been looked at very carefully and staff feels this i consistent with the <br />General Plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti also expressed concern that the project lots are narrower than she <br />would have desired, and that she will be looking carefully at the setb cks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mahern noted that her questions about the remnant lot had been answered by <br />Mr. Swift. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh noted for the record that he had met with the app . cant. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes Ianuary 13, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />