PC 12/09/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Item S.c. W 1 r n z n n ni Application for development plan approval for seven custom helots, one existing home, and 43 acres of open space on a 63-acre site located at 1 115 Dublin Canyon Road. Zoning for the property is PUD (planned Unit Develop ent) - LDRlRDR/PHS (Low Density ResidentiaIJRural Density Residential/Public Hea and Safety) District. A negative declaration has been prepared for this project and ill be considered at this hearing. Continued to 1/13/93. Item S.d. GP-92-06. Kaiser Center for Technolol!V Application to amend the General Plan from a General and L' .ted Industrial General Plan designation to a combined Medium and High Density Res dential General Plan designation or any other land use designation deemed approp te. The subject site is an approximately 62.12 acre portion of a 79.73 +1- acre parce located at 6177 Sunol Boulevard, generally the northeast comer of the Sunol Boulev rdlInterstate-680 Interchange. A negative declaration has been prepared for th project and will be considered at this hearing. Continued to 1/13/93. Item S.e. RZ-92-4, Citv of Pleasanton Application to amend the City of Pleasanton Municipal Code 0 create incentives for property owners to retain and upgrade unreinforced masonry Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of C RZ-92-4 subject to the conditions of the staff report. Commissioner Wright questioned Mr. Swift as to private parking when it reverts to public parking. He asked whether the owner would still retain the title, and whether liability would fall back on the property owner. Mr. Swift replied that it depen s on how it actually becomes implemented. If it is an unreinforced masonry building and an owner wants to expand beyond 25 percent, then there is no requirement that an ner do anything to his parking, but it can just be expanded. If it is not an unreinforced building and the owner wishes to expand and agrees to make a private parking lot and th n wishes to make it open to the public, then the owner could expand beyond the 25 percent 1 vel without having to provide additional on-street parking. At that point it would be a rivately-owned parking lot that would be open to the public. This would still be private pr rty, but with a type of public easement so that liability insurance would cover it. Hower, during the interim period of construction by the City, the City plans to make availa Ie their insurance to such an owner, but not on a permanent basis. Commissioner Mahem questioned as to whether the City's incen 'ves are enough to interest an owner to reinforce his building. Mr. Swift replied that City ouncil has adopted an Planning Commission Minutes December 9, 1992 Page 4