PC 12/09/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Item S.c. 1 n n n ani Application for development plan approval for seven custom ho e lots, one existing home, and 43 acres of open space on a 63-acre site located at 1 15 Dublin Canyon Road. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Developm nt) _ LDRlRDRlPHS (Low Density Residential/Rural Density Residential/Public Heal and Safety) District. A negative declaration has been prepared for this project and be considered at this hearing. Continued to 1/13/93. Item S.d. GP-92-06. Kaiser Center for Technolol!V Application to amend the General Plan from a General and L. ted Industrial General Plan designation to a combined Medium and ffigh Density Resid ntial General Plan designation or any other land use designation deemed appropria e. The subject site is an approximately 62.12 acre portion of a 79.73 +1- acre parcell ted at 6177 Sunol Boulevard, generally the northeast comer of the Sunol Boulevar Interstate-680 Interchange. A negative declaration has been prepared for this roject and will be considered at this hearing. Continued to 1/13/93. Item 5.e. RZ-92-4. Citv of Pleasanton Application to amend the City of Pleasanton Municipal Code to reate incentives for property owners to retain and upgrade unreinforced masonry bu dings. Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Case RZ-92-4 subject to the conditions of the staff report. Commissioner Wright questioned Mr. Swift as to private parking wh n it reverts to public parking. He asked whether the owner would still retain the title, an whether liability would fall back on the property owner. Mr. Swift replied that it depends 0 how it actually becomes implemented. If it is an unreinforced masonry building and an owner wants to expand beyond 25 percent, then there is no requirement that an own do anything to his parking, but it can just be expanded. If it is not an unreinforced bu' ing and the owner wishes to expand and agrees to make a private parking lot and then . shes to make it open to the public, then the owner could expand beyond the 25 percent level ithout having to provide additional on-street parking. At that point it would be a priv tely-owned parking lot that would be open to the public. This would still be private prope , but with a type of public easement so that liability insurance would cover it. However, during the interim period of construction by the City, the City plans to make available eir insurance to such an owner, but not on a permanent basis. Commissioner Mahem questioned as to whether the City's incentives e enough to interest an owner to reinforce his building. Mr. Swift replied that City Coun il has adopted an Planning Commission Minutes December 9, 1992 Page 4