PC 12/09/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Item S.c. 2- 9 W I r n 0 z n Pa ni Application for development plan approval for seven custom horn lots, one existing home, and 43 acres of open space on a 63-acre site located at 111 5 Dublin Canyon Road. Zoning for the property is PUD (planned Unit Developme t) - LDRlRDRlPHS (Low Density ResidentiaIJRural Density Residential/Public Health and Safety) District. A negative declaration has been prepared for this project and w. be considered at this hearing. Continued to 1/13/93. Item S.d. GP-92-06. Kaiser Center for Technolo2V Application to amend the General Plan from a General and Limi ed Industrial General Plan designation to a combined Medium and High Density Resid tial General Plan designation or any other land use designation deemed appropria . The subject site is an approximately 62.12 acre portion of a 79.73 +1- acre parcell ted at 6177 Sunol Boulevard, generally the northeast comer of the Sunol Boulevar Interstate-680 Interchange. A negative declaration has been prepared for this oject and will be considered at this hearing. Continued to 1/13/93. Item S.e. RZ-92-4. City of Pleasanton Application to amend the City of Pleasanton Municipal Code to c te incentives for property owners to retain and upgrade unreinforced masonry bu dings. Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Case RZ-92-4 subject to the conditions of the staff report. Commissioner Wright questioned Mr. Swift as to private parking wh n it reverts to public parking. He asked whether the owner would still retain the title, an whether liability would fall back on the property owner. Mr. Swift replied that it depends 0 how it actually becomes implemented. If it is an unreinforced masonry building and an owner wants to expand beyond 25 percent, then there is no requirement that an own do anything to his parking, but it can just be expanded. If it is not an unreinforced bu' ding and the owner wishes to expand and agrees to make a private parking lot and then . shes to make it open to the public, then the owner could expand beyond the 25 percent level without having to provide additional on-street parking. At that point it would be a pri tely-owned parking lot that would be open to the public. This would still be private propert , but with a type of public easement so that liability insurance would cover it. However, during the interim period of construction by the City, the City plans to make available eir insurance to such an owner, but not on a permanent basis. Commissioner Mahem questioned as to whether the City's incentive are enough to interest an owner to reinforce his building. Mr. Swift replied that City Cou cil has adopted an Planning Commission Minutes December 9, 1992 Page 4