Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Rainey was "stalling" and that she had been given notice 14 month ago that the shed was <br />out of compliance. Furthermore, they felt that if the shed were all wed to stay until <br />February that it would be setting a precedent and make managemen more difficult. She <br />stated that many homeowners in Danbury Park have sheds that are n compliance and saw no <br />reason to allow one that is not in compliance. The Board of Direct rs felt that since Ms. <br />Rainey is moving in February that it would be no problem for her dismantle the shed and <br />store it and the belongings in the garage until that. time. She said y extension beyond 90 <br />days should not be considered as she felt Ms. Rainey has known th shed was not in <br />compliance for 14 months. <br /> <br />Ms. Rainey responded to the Board of Director's memo, and stated at the CC&R's allow <br />the installation of sheds in a back yard without prior or final approv of the Architectural <br />Committee for landscaping or any structural improvements. Sheds listed as structural <br />improvements. She had been advised of her rights by a lawyer and that she should go <br />through the process of approval with the City. She also pointed out that there are other <br />structures in back yards in Danbury Park that are out of compliance as well as hers, which <br />can be seen over the wall. There are a number of deck covers that also out of <br />compliance. She felt that for some reason she was being singled ou . <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Michelotti's question, Ms. Raineyag <br />be adequate time for her to remove the shed. <br /> <br />that 90 days would <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright noted that he had driven by several times and only noticed the deck <br />cover, not the shed. <br /> <br />mE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Comml....ioner Michelotti, seconded by omml"Sloner Mahem <br />making the required f"mdings and upholding the appeal subject t <br />with the following modification: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Deleting in Condition 1 any reference to the grant" of a time extension <br />of up to 30 days, and that the shed be removed wi in 90 days. <br /> <br /> <br />ROLL CA T.T. VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Mahem, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wright and Chairman Hovingh <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-94 was entered and adopted upholding Appeal AP-92-17 as motioned. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />November 11, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />