Laserfiche WebLink
<br />could not happen. He could not support the project at this point and really did not like what <br />he saw. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh asked staff what happens if they deny the project Mr. Swift said the <br />applicant can appeal to City Council or the applicant can request that the PUD be modified. <br />If the applicant redesigns the tentative map, the entire design would aye to be changed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Finch felt that two or three houses could be removed ithout jeopardizing <br />affordability. This would make the existing setbacks and yards large . <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh stated he is very unhappy with the project and th t it pains him to have to <br />deny it. He did appreciate that the applicant is working with Mr. W lcox and Mr. Augusta. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Comm;..~ioner Wright, seconded by Co <br />stating that the required tentative map fmdings cannot be made, <br />6545, <br /> <br />. ioner McGuirk <br />nd denying Tract <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wright, and Chairman Hovingh <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-93 was entered and adopted denying Tract 65 as motioned. <br /> <br />The applicant was informed he has 15 days in which to appeal the d ision to City Council. <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br /> <br />Item 7,8. <br /> <br />Future Planninl! Calendar <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />Item 7.b, <br /> <br />Actions of the City Council <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minntes <br /> <br />October 28, 1992 <br />Page 11 <br />