Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Michael Goldsworthy. 633 Abbie Street, represented the application the architect. He <br />stated they have gone through the Design Review process which was nanimously approved; <br />they have had two neighborhood meetings and tried to address all th comments and concerns <br />of the neighbors. He briefly reviewed the plan on the bulletin board noting that the plan is <br />comparable to the single-family homes in the area. He felt the staff eport covers all the <br />elements of the plan very well. He also noted that some Rotary Clu members are available <br />to answer any questions. He concurred with all the Conditions of A proval. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk referred to the floor plans and commented <br />a door leading from the garage into the house. Mr. Goldsworthy fe <br />accomplished. <br /> <br />at he would like to see <br />this could be <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk questioned Mr. Goldsworthy as to how the <br />handled for the units. Mr. Goldsworthy stated it would be just like <br />neighborhood, in that they would have individual cans. <br /> <br />arbage service would be <br />e rest of the <br /> <br />Patricia Bacon, 3655 Siratt, expressed opposition to the project. Sh noted that she is <br />representing 209 homeowners in her area. She did not object to th project but objected to <br />the particular location. They feel that the two-block area between omino and Norton are <br />overdeveloped as it is. They are aware that the area is zoned high ensity, but are concerned <br />that it will reach too high a density. <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Bacon also felt that the wildlife habitat that comes to the drain e channel will be <br />endangered and they will not come anymore. She felt that the Call an project on the comer <br />of Palomino, and Kottinger to the south was already making too m ch noise. She was <br />opposed to having another six months of construction noise and di and felt this would <br />further make the wildlife habitat leave. She also felt that these two story homes would tower <br />over the existing homes. She concluded her remarks by stating tha she would like to see the <br />City help the Rotary Club find another site for the project. She ap reciated the fact that the <br />Rotary Club was trying to provide affordable housing but did not ink seven houses would <br />make that much difference anyway. <br /> <br />Elaine Walsh, 756 Concord, also expressed opposition to the proj t. She stated that she is a <br />"NIMBY" person and would prefer either a park on that location 0 it be left vacant. She <br />noted that the neighborhood favors a park on that site. She expres ed concern that her <br />property which she purchased for around $300,000 will be devalu if homes in the high <br />$lOO,ooo's are built there. She was also opposed to the possibili of someone being able to <br />see into her house and bedroom. She said she realized that the pI had been changed <br />somewhat to protect her privacy but she was still concerned. She so felt the wildlife would <br />be endangered and was opposed to that. She felt there was alread too high a density in the <br />area, particularly with the construction on Palomino and Bernal, w ich she felt was huge. <br />She felt that traffic was going to be terrible, and in fact, felt there was already too much and <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes October 14, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />