My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/14/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 10/14/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:28:09 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 3:23:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/14/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />it. In addition, he felt some of the first floor buildings downtown ar just not designed for <br />retail. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mahern stated that if they are going to do reconstruc' n they should get it <br />done as quickly as possible. Even though she favored retail-only, sh would not vote against <br />the plan if the rest of the Commission favored it. She generally lik the plan, but would <br />oppose any more wood sidewalks. She liked Ms. Greer's idea of s 'ng a campaign to <br />attract people downtown which should be started immediately and be an on-going process. <br />In regard to design, she is not in favor of a formal appearance for d wntown, but would like <br />a "warmer" look. She would not like a formal appearance at the meum, and felt that the <br />kiosks had a military appearance. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson told the Commission they will have more downtown des gn plans to review in <br />several weeks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright suggested that the City consider making Divis on Street a two-way <br />street during construction. In addition, he would favor directional si ns to various locations <br />or businesses during the construction period. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson noted that staff feels it would be good to make Division Street a two-way street, <br />but it depends on consolidation of parking lots. He said they have s ke to Kolln Hardware <br />who feel they need the space for delivery trucks. Staff will continue to check out the matter. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Commission to keep the bank policy as i is at present, and felt <br />they were vital to downtown. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh favored a two-way street on Spring Street; leave he lighting as it is <br />downtown. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk asked if there will be a PR person lined up or downtown. Mr. <br />Iserson said they will have a person in the very near future working ith the merchants. <br />They will also have a construction manager working as a liaison per on, along with Gail <br />Gilpin of the Transportation Department who has much experience i such issues. <br /> <br />In response to Chairman Hovingh's comments about downtown fees, Mr. Iserson pointed out <br />that those assessment fees go to help support the Downtown Associa 'on, and that during <br />construction the services of PDA will be needed more than ever to Ip with the advertising <br />and marketing campaign to help keep the downtown going and activ . <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Wright, seconded by Co <br />recommending approval of the Draft Downtown Revitalization P <br />conditions of Exhibit A with the following modifications: <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes October 14, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 16 <br /> <br /> <br />. sioner McGuirk <br />n subject to the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.