PC 09/23/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

.~ however, they felt it would be better to address that issue before h Map Extension 6339. Mr. Swift replied that he will talk to the Ci the information might be presented at the October 14 meeting instea 'ng Tentative Tract Attorney to see whether ~ MMI ER Commissioner McGuirk noted that last Saturday seemed to be "pict re day" for the soccer club at the Sports Park on the Zone 7 site. He said that cars were acked up on Parkside; traffic was backed up to get on Hopyard Road; children were runn' g back and forth across the street; and there was a potentially dangerous situation. He ques 'oned whether a conditional use permit was needed for that. Mr. Swift said he did ot know whether the Parks Department had coordinated the event or whether it was done by the Soccer Club. However, he would check into the matter. Chairman Hovingh called staffs attention to a recent event in the B st Plaza where a hot air balloon was displayed. He questioned the legality of it, as it was fi r a single business, not a grand opening of a shopping center. Mr. Swift said it would not b legal for a single business to display the balloon, but it would have been for the open ng of a shopping center. He said staff could check with the company who operates the ball n business to see if they had a permit. s.. PUBLIC HEARINGS -- Item 5.a. AP- 2-13/Z-92-4 Norman Bril!itte Ben Appeal of the decision of the Design Review Board approving a application of Green Scaping/Elder Jerez to retain an existing 238 sq. Ct. pavilion wit a deck, approximately 11 feet in height, located at 2943 Victoria Meadow Court. Zon' g Cor the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - Medium Density Residential District. Mr. Swift presented the staff report which had recommended deni of the appeal for Case AP-92-13, upholding the Design Review Board Approval of Case -92-49, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit C. Staff feels that privacy can be gain with a screen of landscape trees along the west boundary; however, a quicker soluti n to the privacy problem could be achieved by a modification of windows on the west side 0 the pavilion which faces Orofino Court. With those modifications, staff is recommending a proval to the pavilion. Commissioner Wright asked whether the applicant or contractor be penalized after a structure has been built without a permit. Mr. Swift replied that g nerally the penalty would be one-and-a-half or two times the permit fee if the permit is obtai ed after the fact. Commissioner Mahern stated she knew the staff report said the ap icant was in accordance with the PUD in regard to the required setbacks and the municipal rdinance. She asked ,-- Planniug Commission Minutes September 23, 1992 Page 2