Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item S.d. T n n <br />Bank <br />Application Cor a one-year extension of Tentative Tract Map 633 Cor the property <br />located at the north side of Vineyard A venue at Clara Lane. Zo ing for the property is <br />PUD (Planned Unit Development) - MDR (Medium Density Resi ential) District. <br /> <br /> <br />Continued to 10/14/92. <br /> <br />Item S.e. PUD-92-'. .Tim Lavev. Darryl Alexander <br />Application for development plan approval for a planned unit d elopment to construct <br />Cour single-family homes located at the southwest corner of Sy ore Road and Amber <br />Lane. Zoning Cor the property is PUD (Planned Unit Developm nt) - <br />Agriculture/Medium Density Residential District. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Ca PUD-92-7 subject to the <br />conditions of the staff report. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti asked staff if there will be open fencing i the area. Mr. Swift <br />advised there is to be open fencing on Sycamore Road and on Lot 4 <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti expressed concern that one-acre parcels 0 Sycamore Road might <br />be able to be divided sometime in the future and would be opposed 0 that. <br /> <br /> <br />,-- <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh addressed Condition 74 and observed that it indi ted the applicant is not <br />going to have to pay for the undergrounding of the overhead utilitie on the east side of <br />Amber Lane. He wondered who would have to eventually pay for e undergrounding. Mr. <br />Swift replied that this property would not have to pay for it; he no that eventually all lines <br />would be underground and he anticipated that it would be PG&E w 0 would pay for it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mahern noted that the applicant wishes to leave the uestion of the good- <br />neighbor fence up to the individual homeowners of Lots 1, 2, and 3. Mr. Swift said the <br />fence was designed, but the applicant wants to leave the constructio of the fence to the <br />individual homeowner. The recommended Conditions of Approval ould require the <br />developer to install the fence. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Jim Lavey, 4183 First Street, represented the application. He said e and staff have worked <br />hard together to work out the details and he appreciated all the inpu they gave him. <br />However, he objected to Condition 14 which relates to his paying fi r any improvements on <br />Amber Lane and felt that was oppressive. He stated that two of hi three neighbors do not <br />want Amber Lane to go through anyway because of anticipated inc sed traffic that would <br />be going to Sycamore Road and on to Pleasanton; they were willin to dedicate some of their <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes September 23. 1992 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br />