My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/24/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 06/24/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:26:04 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 2:58:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/24/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Mahern, Michelotti, and Vice hairman McGuirk <br />None <br />Commissioner Wright and Chairman Hovingh <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-56 was entered and adopted approving Case P-92-27 as motioned. <br /> <br />RZ-92-2. City of Pleasanton <br />Consideration of a proposed amendment to Chapter 18.100 of th Municipal Code to <br />allow the temporary use of banners for religious institutious. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report for Case RZ-92-2, recommendi that the Commission <br />take public testimony at this meeting, and defer final action until the July 8 meeting as <br />previously discussed. <br /> <br />Vice Chairman McGuirk questioned Mr. Swift as to whether someth ng like a church- <br />sponsored Easter pasta feed would be handled under the proposed a endment. Mr. Swift <br />agreed that it would be intended to cover something of that nature, ther than just religious <br />services. <br /> <br />,-. Commissioner Mahern questioned if the City loosens restrictions on anners for religious <br />institutions, whether that might then have an effect on schools who se banners to advertise <br />spaghetti feeds, etc. Mr. Swift advised that this amendment would ave nothing to do with <br />the school district banners. <br /> <br />Mr. Beougher also advised that the City tries not to regulate County and school district <br />activities and the amendment would not affect the schools. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mahern commented that the schools ordinarily have I ge paper banners that <br />become ragged after a short time. She expressed concern as to the ype of material the <br />churches might use for their banners. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />David Sell, Pastor of Pleasanton Community Church, spoke in favo of the use of banners. <br />He felt it was needed for those who are not regular churchgoers, bu might wish to go to <br />church on Easter or Christmas but do not know what is going on. e felt many people <br />would not attend church if the banners were not used. He also felt t was a good way to let <br />people in town know of other activities within the church, such as s ial meetings, special <br />meals, etc. He felt that he was speaking for most churches in the ea. However, he noted <br />that he does not wish to detract from or oppose the City's existing 'gn ordinance. <br /> <br />PIInnina: Commiuioe Minutes <br />June 24, 1992 <br /> <br />PlieS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.