PC 06/10/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

conditioned to one-story homes on those lots, they would have to co e up with a new plan or have about 10 houses in a row that would look the same. He did not see any problem with several houses overlooking back yards. - Mr. Bartelson addressed Condition 4.a., stating that he agreed with tafrs recommendation to delete lot 90 from its present location and relocate it somewhere se, probably above lot 89. He noted the problem with placing lots that face the cul-de-sac s the cost of about $100,000 of getting sewer/water lines to those three lots. He thoug t that was very costly to serve three lots. The applicant is suggesting that they comply with ondition 4.a. and move lot 89 and 90 to front on another street. Commissioner Wright commented that he understood staff wished to delete lot 90 and allow only three lots, but that the applicant wished to simply relocate lot 9 . Mr. Bartelson replied that the applicant is willing to delete lot 90 from its present location but would like to position it elsewhere. Commissioner Michelotti understood that by deleting lot 90 that it area. Mr. Bartelson agreed that relocating lot 90 would give more pointed out that feature on the map. Mr. Swift commented that it get three larger lots by deleting lot 90 and have the same size park. uld enhance the park m to the park and uld also be possible to Commissioner Mahem commented that she thought there was going to be more of a "feathering" effect coming from the Hirst property. Mr. Bartelson xplained how the present square footage came about, noting that staff had given them directio to stay around 10,000 sq. ft, lots, He noted that this appeared to be a better transition to e neighborhood than previously planned. r- Commissioner McGuirk asked Mr. Swift for clarification about traf c movement around a future school and park in the area. Mr. Swift commented that eve . g has been approved from the main entry street that adjoins Village One, which included e school and park. Tonight they are just looking at Village One. In response to Commissioner Michelotti's question, Mr. Swift sta has not yet been done. Council has determined where the school park. the design of the park II be located, but not the Discussion ensued between the Commission and Mr. Bartelson reg ding the type of fencing in Village One. Mr. Bartelson indicated the plan at present is to pu up redwood fences, but indicated that open fencing could be utilized. David Gonsalves, 2215 Martin Avenue, stated that he felt before to ight the applicant and the neighbors were getting close to an agreement. However, he fel now that staff is changing the plan by moving lots 87-90 around, which would crea more of a rectangle. r- Planning COmnUl8ion Minute. June 10, 1992 Page 4