Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br /> <br />Mr. Swift requested that UP-91-10, Pleasanton Garbage Service, In . be continued to Iune <br />24, 1992. The Commission agreed to this request. <br /> <br />MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MRMBERS <br /> <br />1. Commissioner Wright called attention to the Bank of Pleasanton <br />they will paint the area where the old sign was. Mr. Swift replied <br />would, but that staff will check on this matter. <br /> <br />d wondered whether <br />at he felt sure they <br /> <br />2. Commissioner Mahem asked if the color of Bellina's was an a <br />replied that the color of paint was not an approved shade; staff will <br />change the color to the approved one. <br /> <br /> <br />oved color. Mr. Swift <br />ttempt to get them to <br /> <br />3. Commissioner McGuirk called staffs attention to an area of the <br />Field 2 dugout, and noted that there must be a leak as it is like a s <br />replied that staff will check on the matter. <br /> <br />4. Chairman Hovingh Said he had two items to discuss at the latter art of the meeting: 1. <br />Commendation for Commissioner Horan; 2. Whether Matters Initi ted by the Commission <br />should be handled after all cases are reviewed. <br /> <br />OLD BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />PUD-92-4. Miriam Chu and Max Gahl'llhmat <br />Application for PUD development plan approval to allow the co <br />small- and large-lot single-family detached units on the approx' <br />One site of the larger Chu/Gahrahmat property located along th <br />Arroyo Mocho northerly of the intersection of Stoneridge Drive <br />Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - <br />Density Residential and Medium Density Residential) District. <br /> <br /> <br />ruction of up to 95 <br />tely 17.1 acre Village <br />southerly side of the <br />.th Stone Pointe Way. <br />Rand MDR (Low <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Cas PUD-92-4 subject to the <br />conditions of the staff report. He called attention to several conditi n changes: Condition <br />4.f. - Staff is recommending that lots 17 and 18 should have single- tory houses and that the <br />additional 5-ft. setback not be required. Condition 4.h. - This can e deleted, or it can be <br />noted that it does not apply to the cul-de-sacs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright asked for clarification regarding Condition 4. . and whether <br />reconfiguration would negate the need for the utilities, and whether at would also eliminate <br />the need for a cul-de-sac. Mr. Swift said those lots would have fro tage on the new streets. <br />The Specific Plan still shows a bulb on the end of Martin Avenue ich will basically be a <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />June 10, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />