Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Mahem, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wright and Chairman Hovingh <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-52 was entered and adopted approving Case ntative Tract Map 6266 <br />as motioned. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti stated she also had spoken privately with . Summers. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the application. Chairman Hovi gh noted that even <br />though development has stopped on the project, the DeSilva Group s benefitted the City by <br />putting up $1. 5 million for a school. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh further expressed some of his concerns about Te tative Map extensions <br />and requested that staff put something in writing regarding the chang ng of Tentative Map <br />extensions. <br /> <br />GP-92-2/PUD-92-S. Citv of Pleasanton <br />Application to change the General Plan land use designation for blic Health and <br />~ Safety to Low Density Residential, and an application to change e zoning designation <br />from the Agricultural District to the Planned Unit Development - Low Density <br />Residential District on an approximately lO-acre site located on e east side of Foothill <br />Road, north of the Verona Bridge. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Case GP-92-2/PUD-92-5 <br />subject to the conditions of the staff report. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mahem referred to Table 3 of the Proposed Standard of Development, <br />Building Design, and questioned Mr. Swift as to why the word "avo' ed" is used in terms of <br />bright colors such as red-tiled roofs and light stucco walls of white, ellow or similar tones. <br />She thought it should read "prohibited". Mr. Swift sind that was the language that was in the <br />County approval, so staff is just being consistent with that. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti asked for clarification as to the size of the 018 and the setbacks, <br />She further called attention to wording that said: "Open fencing is e couraged, with privacy <br />fencing permitted in areas of the lot which are not required yard s." Mr. Swift explained <br />that would be out of the side, front, and rear yard areas, similar to hat is permitted in the <br />Golden Eagle Farms subdivision. He continued to say that fencing ould go back to the <br />Design Review Board as part of the approval process. Commissione Michelotti stressed that <br />she favored open fencing with landscaping. <br /> <br />,---- Planning Commiuion Minute. <br />Juno 10, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 16 <br />