PC 03/11/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

,- Discussion ensued regarding an open space management program or the hillside open space area. Mr. Swift noted that this is contained in Condition 12; how ver, the staff report should be amended to say that the maintenance program shall be ministered by a Lighting District, not homeowners' association. He further commented tha staff is somewhat confused by a comment made by Mr. Dommer that the homeown rs of the subdivision would have the ability to utilize that open space area for access and trail urposes, rather than a limited portion of it. He said this needs to be clarified tonight. Bob Frillman, 9911 Foothill Road, said he had about three pages f questions some hours ago; however, at nearly 2:00 in the morning he only wished to sa that it appears nobody wants to abide by the rules. According to what he understood fro Alameda County guidelines, he thought that zoning should approximate .9 units per acre. That amounts to about 40 units. He felt that even if 51 units are approved that wo Id be too much. He did not think terminology such as "the applicant made great strides' i lowering the units from 70-some units to 60 then to 54 was "great strides.' He reiterated that he felt 40 units might be about right. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Wright wished to make sure that should the appli t go through an EIR to fmd that an equestrian center would be okay without destroying area, that people who have property there would have opportunity to use it. He questio ed whether there might be a point in time where the owner of the equestrian center could ch ge for the use of the facility. Mr. Swift indicated that this is not covered in the condi' ns of approval, but can be addressed . o That Condition 43 shall reflect Class A fire retar t roofing; Discussion ensued as to whether the height limit should be chang from 30 to 35 ft. A motion was made by Commissioner Wright, seconded by Com . ssioner Michelotti recommending approval of Case PUD-89-17 subject to the conditi ns listed in Exhibit "B" with the following modifications: o That Condition 82.c. shall reflect 600 sq. ft. ins of 650 sq. ft, for the garage area; o That Condition 82.a. shall allow that lots with grea er than 15 percent slope could go to a 35 ft. height limit; those lots probabl being 5, 6, 7, and 44 through 52, to be measured from the lowest point the highest point; o That Condition 19 be amended to permit maintenan vehicles; o That Condition 39 be modified to say that the stree configuration shall be resolved at the Final Map Stage; and o That sidewalks shall be deleted; and Minutes Planning Commi.aion Ma",h 11, 1992 Faa_ 20