SR 05:135 - Laserfiche WebLink

TABLE 2 ASSUMED PEAK-HOUR SPREADING TraP ORIGIN/DESTINATION [ A,M. I PiM. Pleasanton to Pleasanton ......... ~:':~' -~ii~ ~ a-'~;ii~-~-~ ........................................... I .................. 5'f~'6~- ................. ] ............. 'STi6'g/~- ............ D~,-~L'~.:~ .......... l~'z .......................................................................................... * ....................................... ..... '~-bRun Trips 20 576 ] 25,369 ...... i~ ~ii~-'~"~]~-a §'~i:~i;;-~;'iq-~h--i~-e'~ fi$'~ ........................... 5%- .................... ~ ......... ~)~ ................ Pleasanton to Non-Pleasanton ............ il;- TM............................................. I ................... /<5-56' .................. l ............. '5'51 '5;f ............ ............................... -~-~:ii"~''2 ............................................... 7,891 19 239 .._M._o..d_ p .............................................................................................. ] ....................................... ......... Percent Trips "Spread" to Non-Peak Hours / 4% ] 19% Non-Pleasanton to Pleasanton .................................................. ............. 2~;,-~9,'-~2;-; ~1-';~-]~-~TM ........................................... I .................. 5~1'5~0 1 11,663 ............................ ~'-~-~"~"2 ..................... 19 431 10,956 Model-Ru p ..................................................................... ~ ....................................... ........ I:; ~-~ ~ ~;~-'~ ~'] ~-a ~'J~{e'~{~;;-{~ ' }q-~ h]~'~ H ° ur s I 23% / 6% Non-Pleasanton to Non-Pleasanto .................................... ......... 'i3 ~- ';~.]~ -/~'~.-~'~;;-~;'~-~ h:-~'~ 'h';'~; ;"- '- '1 ..................... ;~- ............ ] 10%o ~ "Demand-Based Trips" are trips generated by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) land-use tables, adjusted for Pleasanton experience. ~ "Model-Run Trips" are trips included in the peak-hour model runs; they are identical for Year 2010 and 2025 for Pleasanton land uses. ~ These are regional trips in the model and include the entire Bay Area; not all go through Pleasanton. In comparing the Existing Plus Approved, Year 2025 model run to the Existing Plus Approved, Year 2010 model run, the effects of the failures ofi-580, 1-680, and Highway 84 to accommodate projected through traffic are reflected by increase in traffic on local City streets. Cut-through traffic grows along the Sunol Boulevard-First Street-Stanley Boulevard route (including its Bernal Avenue option), and, due to increased congestion on local streets, local trips tend to re-route when alternative routes are available. The negative effect of growth of regional trips on Pleasanton streets is lessened by a number of new routes (Dublin Boulevard extension to Livermore, Jack London Boulevard to El Charro Road) and freeway widening which lessen delay, particularly as they attract trips otherwise using the Valley Avenue-Stanley Boulevard route to eastbound destinations. In summary, the intersection levels of service projected in the Year 2025 model run are somewhat worse and require some additional intersection mitigations to function as efficiently as possible. Intersection Levels of Service As can be seen in the summary portion of Table 3 ("Average Delay per Vehicle at Study Intersections"), attached, citywide delay at City intersections grows for both the Year 2010 and 2025 compared to existing delay, even after intersection mitigations are implemented. (Note: the mitigations include no new Pleasanton streets, street extensions, or street SR 05:135 Page 4