My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:123
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2005 9:05:24 AM
Creation date
5/12/2005 8:56:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:123
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vanessa Kawaihu, 871 Sycamore Road, complimented the City on finding a fine <br />architect to design the homes near the golf course and ensuring a high standard of design. <br />She stressed the need to have permeable paving surfaces because of the closed aquifer. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts moved to approve Case PDR-426 as recommended by staff, <br />with the addition of a condition to investigate the gray water situation in proximity <br />to the wetlands. <br />Commissioner Blank seconded the motion. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Blank, Fox, Maas and Roberts. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-2005-13 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />e. PUD-36~ Mike Waist <br /> Work session to review and provide comments on the applications for PUD <br /> rezoning and development plan approval to construct seven light industrial/ <br /> warehouse buildings totaling 46,550 square feet on a 2.53-acre parcel located on <br /> the easterly comer of Valley Avenue and Busch Road. Zoning for the property is <br /> S (Study) District. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker introduced Mr. Pavan, who corrected the staff report and stated that because <br />the zoning is industrial, a General Plan Amendment is not required. He summarized the <br />staff report and described the history and scope of this application. He noted that the <br />property was highly constrained. The purpose of the work session was to determine <br />whether the Planning Commission considered the proposed project to be a workable <br />development type for this site. If so, the applicant will do the necessary additional work, <br />generate uses and traffic analysis, and return for a public heating. He noted that the <br />project posed a difficult design challenge and that the landscape area on the edge of the <br />parking area was five feet with a three-foot overhang. It rendered the provision of <br />bioswales (requiring 10 feet of width) to be infeasible. He displayed the site plan on the <br />screen and described the features of the property. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Mike Walsh, applicant, stated that a left-turn lane at Boulder Street into the property was <br />constructed to control the entrance and exit. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 7, 2005 Page 7 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.