My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-93-62
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
PC-93-62
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:47 AM
Creation date
5/11/2005 4:52:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/13/1993
DOCUMENT NO
PC-93-62
DOCUMENT NAME
VTTM 6291
NOTES
DE SILVA GROUP/HELLER SEAS
NOTES 3
SUBD 4.25 AC INTO 36 LOTS, RHEEM/OAKLAND
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEAS TON <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-93-62 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE T CT MAP 6291, THE <br />APPLICATION OF THE DESILVA GROUP/HELLER S ASONINGS <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the DeSilva Group/Heller Seasonings has applied for a <br />vesting tentative map to allow the subdivision of an <br />approximately 4.25 acre site into 6 resiQential lots <br />located at the southwest corne of the Rheem <br />Drive/Oakland Avenue street intersec ion; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD (Plann d Unit Development) <br />- High Density Residential District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing f October 13, 1993, <br />the Planning commission considered a I public testimony, <br />relevant exhibits and recommendation of the City staff <br />concerning this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />a Negative Declaration of Environmen <br />previously prepared and adopted b <br />approval of PUD-90-20; and <br /> <br />al Significance was <br />council with the <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission made the fol owing findings: <br /> <br />1. The proposed map is consisten with the General <br />Plan. <br /> <br />The proposed application is substantially <br />consistent with the proposed PU development plan. <br />This plan is substantially c nsistent with the <br />original approval which was dee ed compatible with <br />the General Plan. The propos d project will not <br />alter any issue which uld change its <br />compatibility with the General Ian. <br /> <br />2. The site is physically suitabl for this type of <br />development and density. <br /> <br />Although the construction of t <br />will involve site grading and <br />existing topography, this woul <br />city standards. The results 0 <br />study submitted in conjunctio <br />PUD application indicates that <br />for residential development. <br /> <br />e proposed project <br />alteration of the <br />be achieved within <br />the geologic/soil <br />with the original <br />he site is suitable <br /> <br />3. The design of the subdivi ion and proposed <br />improvements will not ause substantial <br />environmental damage or subs tan ially and avoidably <br />injure fish or wildlife or the"r habitat. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.