My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-93-48
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
PC-93-48
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:46 AM
Creation date
5/11/2005 3:52:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/11/1993
DOCUMENT NO
PC-93-48
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-90-19-2M
NOTES
BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENT/MOLLER RANCH
NOTES 3
MAJOR MOD: CHANGE 58 TH TO SFH: LOT SIZE TO 8,000 SQ. FT.,
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Resolution No. PC-93-48 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />2. Whether the plan is consistent w th the city's <br />General Plan. <br /> <br />The proposed PUD modification is not changing any <br />issues which would affect the pr viously approved <br />project's consistency with the G neral Plan. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Whether the plan is compatible w <br />developed properties in the vici <br />natural topographical features 0 <br /> <br />The project site is located in a <br />mainly undeveloped. However, on <br />Foothill Road, to the north and <br />various custom and production re <br />have been approved in recent yea <br />projects are located on sites th <br />topographically similar to the M <br />property. To the east across Fo <br />single-family production homes. <br />residential use of the property <br />compatible with the surrounding <br />The construction of the small-lo <br />units would slightly deviate fro <br />residential construction adjacen <br />However, this unit type is more <br />the previously approved townhome <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Whether grading takes into accou <br />characteristics and is designed <br />the best engineering practices t <br />slides, or flooding to have as m <br />the environment as possible. <br /> <br />th previously <br />ity and the <br />the site. <br /> <br />area which is <br />the west side of <br />outh of the site, <br />idential projects <br />s. These <br />tare <br />ller Ranch <br />thill Road are <br />The proposed <br />ould be <br />esidential uses. <br />residential <br />the type of <br />to the site. <br />ompatible than <br />units. <br /> <br /> <br />t environmental <br />n keeping with <br />avoid erosion, <br />nimal effect on <br /> <br />The geotechnical reports which h <br />for the project have addressed t <br />problems associated with develop <br />In addition, specific mitigation <br />recommended enable safe resident <br />site. These mitigation measures <br />included as conditions of approv <br />conditions, staff believes that <br />impacts of the project will not <br />that this finding can be made. <br /> <br />5. Whether streets and buildings ha e been designed <br />and located to complement the na ural terrain and <br />landscape. <br /> <br />ve been prepared <br />e geotechnical <br />ent of the site. <br />measures <br />al use of the <br />have been <br />1. wi th these <br />he environmental <br />e significant and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.