Laserfiche WebLink
TOWN HALL MEETING WALLGRAPHIC COMMENT <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />QUESTIONS · Why is there an additional train station in plans when we already have one on the <br /> Fairgrounds? <br /> <br /> · What are the comparative advantages and disadvantages of the two park designs? <br /> <br /> · What is the timing for planning land west of HWY 1-6807 <br /> <br /> · Will there be a similar planning process for developing land west of HWY 1-6807 <br /> <br /> · Will the park facilitate jogging and running? <br /> <br />GENERAL COMMENTS · Support needs of a diverse community <br /> <br /> · Keep in mind that periphery of park is to be beautiful <br /> <br /> · Change "Community Park" title of sports area to "Sports Park" and put "Community Park" <br /> as title of entire property <br /> <br />PLAN ALTERNATIVE PREFERENCES <br />Community Park <br /> <br /> · "Third Draft" option is preferred because it includes fields needed to meet high demand <br />Bemal Property <br /> <br /> · Alternative A has community arts center much too close to freeway <br /> <br /> · Prefer Alternative A, but modified to put tennis courts in space where train station would <br /> go and remove train station from the property all together <br /> <br /> · Prefer Alternative D (4) <br /> There is available technology for the amphitheater to mitigate sounds and noise <br /> Preferred by sports community because provides enough fields to meet needs (3) <br /> Places the Amphitheater too close to housing <br /> · Prefer Alternative B because it provides continuous open space <br /> <br /> · Prefer Alternative C but modified to have CAC located nearer to Downtown and put train <br /> somewhere that will not conflict with sports or school <br /> <br />Bernal Property Town Meeting I SummaryReport-Apnlll, 2005 Page4 <br /> <br /> <br />