My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-92-99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC-92-99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:34:00 AM
Creation date
5/4/2005 4:49:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/30/1992
DOCUMENT NO
PC-92-99
DOCUMENT NAME
RZ-92-4
NOTES
CITY OF PLEASANTON
NOTES 3
AMEND PMC: INCENTIVES FOR URM AND PUBLIC USE OF PRIVATELY-OWNED OFF-STREET PARKING
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />alter the essential character of the built context. In such , the IleeftI commission <br />shall delay issuance of the certificate for one hundred eigh days for structures of <br />primary significance and ninety days for structures of secon significance. During <br />the delay period, the eeere commission shall take such acti n as it deems necessary to <br />preserve the structure. Such action may include negotiation with civic groups, public <br />or private agencies or individuals for the purchase, lease or location of the <br />structure. The be&M commission may also suggest eminent domain proceedings be <br />initiated by the city council. <br /> <br />Chapter 18.88 <br /> <br />Off-Street Parking Facilities. <br /> <br />18.88.020 <br /> <br />Basic requirements. <br /> <br />A. (no change) <br />B. (no change) <br />C. (no change) <br />0.1 through 0.2 (no changes) <br /> <br />D.3. As detennined on a case-by-case basis by the City, e provision of additional <br />oil-street parking fadlitUs and/or in-lieu parking fi s for building <br />expansions excleding twenty-/ive percent of the to gross floor QI'IIl and/or <br />for proposed new building construction rtUly be wai ell if tJu property owner <br />allows the existing parking on the property to be op n to the publk. <br />ConsideroJions will include access, circulolion, the umber of resulJing <br />parking spaces serving the building, the effect on .acent parking lots, and <br />whether or not an unrWiforced mosonry (URM) b . g upgrade is <br />involved. . Under this provision, new construction 0 building expansions <br />sholl not excled a bask floor QI'IIl. roJio of two hu Ted percent and sholl not <br />excled twO-sIorUS in heighl. Any property receivin such a parking waiver <br />which later reveTts to private use would then becom liabk to provide the <br />required parking and/or in-lieu fee in effect at the e of the revenion to <br />private use. <br /> <br />E. For property with unreinforced mosonry (URM) bu . gs, as dqinell in <br />section 18.08.407 of this title, thefoUowing sholl dify the bask <br />requirements of subsections A and D of this section. <br /> <br />1. UnrWiforced mosonry buildings ofprinuuy r secondary significance <br />which are located on property %Oned C-C within the Downtown <br />Rll'ito1irptl"n District boundaries as shown 0 the %Oiling maps on file <br />with the city 11UJY be expanded up to a bask or QI'IIl roJio of two <br />hundTed percent without providing any . nal off-street parking <br />faci/iJies and/or in-lieu parking fees if the b in, is rWiforced to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.