My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-92-80
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC-92-80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:58 AM
Creation date
5/4/2005 3:44:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/9/1992
DOCUMENT NO
PC-92-80
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-81-30-26M/PUD-85-8-8M
NOTES
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO
NOTES 3
DEVT AGMTS GOVERNING 262 ACRES OFHBP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />proposed city-wide traffic mitigation impact fee proposed in the <br />document entitled "1992 Traffic Fee study" prepared by the city <br />of P1easanton staff, dated September 1, 1992; and <br /> <br />c. If the City enacts a city-wide traffic <br />mitigation impact fee and has collected funds in excess of the <br />amount of the W. Las positas/I-680 interchange costs, the <br />Developer shall have no further obligations under this additional <br />mitigation section. However, if the city has collected only a <br />percentage of the W.Las positas/I-680 interchange costs, the <br />undeveloped land within the Property shall participate in the <br />funding, subject to the subsections herein, the remaining costs <br />when traffic levels above Service "D" occur which require W. Las <br />positas/I-680 interchange to be constructed.. All funds collected <br />from the city-wide traffic mitigation impact fee shall be assumed <br />to have been credited to this interchange project, even if the <br />funds are used for other traffic impact projects. For example, <br />if the city has c~llected $10,000,000 in traffic impact fees and <br />spent this amount on other traffic projects, the undeveloped land <br />within the Property shall be excused from participation in <br />funding this interchange project if the interchange project is <br />less than $10,000,000. If the City has collected only $2,000,000 <br />in traffic impact fees, the undeveloped land within the Property <br />shall participate in the funding of the amount above $2,000,000, <br />subject to reimbursement from a benefit district as stated in <br />subsections d,e and f; and <br /> <br />d. The Developer agrees not to protest the formation <br />of the benefit district, but reserves the right to contest the <br />spread of such costs as necessary to construct said interchange <br />project if the costs are not apportioned on a pro-rata basis of <br />the impact from the property; and <br /> <br />e. The City agrees to include within the boundaries <br />of the benefit district such undeveloped land that (i) will be <br />sufficient to repay the Developer or then current owner of the <br />Property assessed; and (ii) to include undeveloped lands <br />sufficient to fund the amount of the money advanced and allowing <br />a reasonable interest rate on Developer'S money advance. The <br />appropriate interest rate shall be determined by the City and <br />Developer when and if money is advanced; and <br /> <br />f. For purposes of this subsection, undeveloped land <br />shall mean such property that has not received a building permit <br />or if a building permit has been issued, construction shall be <br />completed within 18 months of its issuance or it will be subject <br />to an assessment, as an undeveloped land parcel. <br /> <br />- 6 - <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />. .1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.