Laserfiche WebLink
<br />proposed city-wide traffic mitigation impact fee proposed in the <br />document entitled "1992 Traffic Fee study" prepared by the city <br />of P1easanton staff, dated September 1, 1992; and <br /> <br />c. If the City enacts a city-wide traffic <br />mitigation impact fee and has collected funds in excess of the <br />amount of the W. Las positas/I-680 interchange costs, the <br />Developer shall have no further obligations under this additional <br />mitigation section. However, if the city has collected only a <br />percentage of the W.Las positas/I-680 interchange costs, the <br />undeveloped land within the Property shall participate in the <br />funding, subject to the subsections herein, the remaining costs <br />when traffic levels above Service "D" occur which require W. Las <br />positas/I-680 interchange to be constructed.. All funds collected <br />from the city-wide traffic mitigation impact fee shall be assumed <br />to have been credited to this interchange project, even if the <br />funds are used for other traffic impact projects. For example, <br />if the city has c~llected $10,000,000 in traffic impact fees and <br />spent this amount on other traffic projects, the undeveloped land <br />within the Property shall be excused from participation in <br />funding this interchange project if the interchange project is <br />less than $10,000,000. If the City has collected only $2,000,000 <br />in traffic impact fees, the undeveloped land within the Property <br />shall participate in the funding of the amount above $2,000,000, <br />subject to reimbursement from a benefit district as stated in <br />subsections d,e and f; and <br /> <br />d. The Developer agrees not to protest the formation <br />of the benefit district, but reserves the right to contest the <br />spread of such costs as necessary to construct said interchange <br />project if the costs are not apportioned on a pro-rata basis of <br />the impact from the property; and <br /> <br />e. The City agrees to include within the boundaries <br />of the benefit district such undeveloped land that (i) will be <br />sufficient to repay the Developer or then current owner of the <br />Property assessed; and (ii) to include undeveloped lands <br />sufficient to fund the amount of the money advanced and allowing <br />a reasonable interest rate on Developer'S money advance. The <br />appropriate interest rate shall be determined by the City and <br />Developer when and if money is advanced; and <br /> <br />f. For purposes of this subsection, undeveloped land <br />shall mean such property that has not received a building permit <br />or if a building permit has been issued, construction shall be <br />completed within 18 months of its issuance or it will be subject <br />to an assessment, as an undeveloped land parcel. <br /> <br />- 6 - <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />. .1 <br />