PC-92-66 - Laserfiche WebLink

taken by such other agencies. If taken, such actions would avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Findine:: The efforts of the water purveyors in the area will allow for efficient provision of water for the area. Mitigation measures such as phasing of development and requiring water conservation features to be implemented will help to ensure that water is used efficiently. CUMULATIVE IMPACT: SCHOOLS IMPACT: Increased population due to new development adds to the pressure on local school districts. FEIR page 13-6. Mitigation Measure 13.3-2: .Approval of the Kottinger Hills project shall be contingent upon satisfactory enrollment capacity. The applicants shall participate in an equitable. funding plan established by the Pleasanton Unified School District. Finding: Such actions are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the City of Pleasant on. Such actions can and should be taken by such other agencies. If taken, such actions would avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding: The proposed funding plan will provide a mechanism for financing necessary school facilities to serve new residents. CUMULATIVE IMPACT: VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE IMPACT 13.4B: There is a continuing loss of existing vegetation and wildlife habitat to urban development in the area. FEIR page 13-7. Mitigation Measure 13.4-1: Continue requirements for replacement or restoration of wetlands and other critical habitat. FEIR page 13-7. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project. However, the changes or alterations required in, or incorporated into the project would not reduce the project's contribution to this impact to a level of insignificance. Therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon approval of the project. Rationale for Finding: The mitigation measures of the EIR, and the ongoing requirements of the City and other agencies, would reduce the magnitude of this loss. However, the project by itself would create an unavoidable adverse impact on vegetation and wildlife, and this individual project impact would combine with other projects in the area to produce an unavoidable cumulative impact. 18 " .