My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-93-02
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
PC-93-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:41 AM
Creation date
4/27/2005 1:25:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/13/1993
DOCUMENT NO
PC-93-02
DOCUMENT NAME
V-92-15/Z-92-223
NOTES
CARL METZ
NOTES 3
VARIANCES: REAR YARD SETBACK; AND MAXIMUM FAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMKISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALXFOlUlJ:A <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-93-02 <br /> <br />RESOLUTXON APPROVING THE VARXANCE FOR THE REAR YARD SETBACK <br />AND DENYING WXTHOUT PREJUDICE THE VARIANCE FOR EXCEEDING THE <br />IlAXXKUK FLOOR AREA RATXO AS FXLED UNDER CASE V-U-1S/Z-92-223, <br />THE APPLXCATXON OF CARL K. KETZ <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Carl M. Metz has applied for 1) a variance from the <br />Municipal Code to permit construction of a second-story <br />addition within a portion of the required rear yard and <br />to exceed the maximum floor area ratio of 40 percent, and <br />2) design review approval to construct an approximately <br />1,500 square foot, two-story addition to an existing <br />residence located at 1533 Harvest Road; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is R-1-6500 District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of January 13, 1993, <br />the Planning commission considered all public testimony, <br />relevant exhibits and recommendations of the City staff <br />concerning this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, projects of this nature are categorically exempt from the <br />requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission made the following findings: <br /> <br />A. That because of special circumstances applicable to <br />the property, including size, shape, topography, <br />location or surroundings, the strict application of <br />the provisions of this chapter deprives such <br />property of privileges enjoyed by other properties <br />in the vicinity and under identical zoning <br />classification. <br /> <br />Rear Yard Encroachment: The applicant's lot is <br />comparable in size to other lots in the <br />neighborhood. However, the rear property line is <br />not parallel to the front property line, which <br />causes a considerable reduction on the depth of the <br />lot from west to east. Due to this reduction in <br />the depth of the lot, the setback of the addition <br />changes considerably from a maximum of 20 feet to a <br />minimum of 13 feet. Were the depth of the yard <br />maintained from the eastern property line to the <br />western, the addition would maintain a 30 foot <br />setback from the rear property line. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.