My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-92-19
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC-92-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:51 AM
Creation date
4/20/2005 3:26:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/26/1992
DOCUMENT NO
PC-92-19
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-91-05
NOTES
ANITA DAVIDSON
NOTES 3
4-UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-92-19 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CASE PUD-91-0S, THE <br />APPLICATION OF ANITA DAVIDSON <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Anita Davidson has applied for planned unit development <br />(PUD) approval to rezone approximately one acre of land <br />from the AgricUltural zoning district to the PUD (Planned <br />Unit Development) - Medium Density Residential (MDR) <br />District and for development plan approval for a four- <br />unit single-family residential development located at <br />1635 Rose Avenue; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is A (Agriculture) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at their duly noticed hearing of February 26, 1992, the <br />Planning Commission, after considering all public <br />testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the <br />city staff concerning this proposal, recommended approval <br />of the proposed negative declaration for Case PUD-91-05; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission makes the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The plan is in the best interests of the public <br />health, safety, and general welfare: <br /> <br />The proposed project would be consistent with all <br />applicable city standards concerning public health, <br />safety, and welfare as approved. sewage, water, <br />and storm drainage improvements would be consistent <br />with long range planned improvements and standards <br />as conditioned. <br /> <br />2. The plan is consistent with the city's General <br />Plan: <br /> <br />The project is within the acceptable range for PUD- <br />MDR (Medium Density Residential) projects of 2-8 <br />units/acre. However, limitations in water, sewer, <br />access, and storm drain infrastructure improvements <br />create the need to develop the area at the lower <br />end of the General Plan range. The project at 3 <br />d.u.'s/acre is in the lower end of the General Plan <br />range, thus the 3-lot proposal is consistent with <br />the city's policy direction expressed at the time <br />the Medium Density Residential General Plan <br />designation was adopted. <br /> <br />- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.