My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:103
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2005 3:35:05 PM
Creation date
4/13/2005 3:28:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:103
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rem, nearly 54% pay more than 30% of their income, while 27% pay more than 50% of their <br />income. In most cases, the percentage of households with this type of housing problem has <br />increased between 1990 and 2000 based on information collected in the decennial censuses. <br /> <br />The 2000 Census did not reveal any clear trends regarding housing problems among minorities. <br />However, census data from 1990 and 2000 indicate a gradual shift toward greater ethnic diversity <br />in Pleasanton. Therefore, the City will continue to monitor housing trends among different <br />ethnic groups in the future. <br /> <br />A sizeable portion of these subsidized units face conversion to market-rate rents in the near <br />future. According to the Alameda County Subsidized Housing Inventory (1997), between 1993 <br />and 1995 there was a 9% reduction is affordable restricted rental units for very low income <br />families and a 16% reduction in affordable restricted units for extremely low income. <br /> <br />Approximately 200 below-market rental units in Pleasanton reverted to market rates between <br />1998 and 2003 due to the expiration of regulatory agreements. This occurred in spite of the <br />City's efforts to create financial and other incentives for apartment owners to extend the <br />agreement terms. These trends indicate that very low income families face an increasing risk of <br />becoming homeless, experiencing overcrowded housing conditions and/or paying precariously <br />high percentages of their incomes for housing. <br /> <br />Most subsidized housing developments with units for very low income households have long <br />waiting lists, and the waiting time can be two years or more. Section 8 and Public Housing <br />programs within the HOME Consortium have approximately 10,000 households on their waiting <br />lists. The number of landlords who are willing to provide subsidized housing will still not keep <br />up with demand-even with these additional vouchers. <br /> <br /> There are approximately 6,000 Section 8 vouchers in use in the portion of the county <br /> administered by the Housing Authority of Alameda County, or HACA (Pleasanton, Dublin, <br /> Castro Valley, Emeryville, Fremont, Hayward, Newark, San Leandro, San Lorenzo, Union City, <br /> and the unincorporated county). Approximately 10,000 more vouchers are in use in other areas <br /> of Alameda Connty. When HACA opened its waiting list in December 2001, 12,560 <br /> applications were received. However, only 3,500 or about a quarter of these were placed on a <br /> waiting list (through a lottery process). <br /> <br /> DRAFT - Strategic Plan - FY2005- FY2009 <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.