My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:103
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2005 3:35:05 PM
Creation date
4/13/2005 3:28:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:103
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART I. PRIORITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEEDS <br /> <br />Priority: Increase and maintain the number of affordable rental <br />units for low and moderate income households by encouraging unit <br />affordability for the maximum number of years possible, with an <br />emphasis on maintaining affordable units for the following <br />populations: emancipated youth, families, adult population (21 - 64 <br />years), seniors, under-served minorities and special populations. <br /> <br />Priority Analysis and Obstacles to Meeting Underserved Needs <br /> <br />The need for affordable rental housing in Alameda County has increased dramatically in the past <br />five years. The need far exceeds the supply of affordable rental housing in the Alameda County <br />HOME Consortium. The Alameda County HOME Consortium Housing Needs Analysis <br />indicates that the majority of low income rental households (earning 80 percent or less of the <br />Area Median Income, or AMI) spend more than 30% of their incomes on housing costs. <br /> <br />Affordable housing is in short supply throughout the county. Very high cost housing markets <br />reduce the supply of affordable housing even further. As rents increase, subsidies in rental <br />assistance programs also increase, which results in a reduction in the number of persons that can <br />be served in these programs. <br /> <br />In the late 1990's, rents increased significantly while vacancy rates decreased. These trends <br />peaked in 2000 and 2001. The resulting competition resulted in an extremely tight rental market, <br />notably in Pleasanton and the surrounding Tri-Valley area. Some landlords who had previously <br />accepted Section 8 were no longer willing to do so because of the limitations on the rents that can <br />be charged under the program. Rents have begun to stabilize since reaching a peak in 2000 and <br />2001. However, the rental market still poses a significant challenge to households in the lower <br />income categories. Figure 1 shows rent trends in Pleasanton between 1995 and 2004. <br /> <br /> DRAFT - Strategic Plan - FY2005- FY2009 <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> Page 1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.