Laserfiche WebLink
STRAFACE <br /> <br /> March 10, 2005 <br /> <br /> To: City of Pleasamon Planning Department/City Council <br /> <br /> From: Dan Strafaee <br /> Property Manager <br /> <br /> Re: UP-8g-17 <br /> 725 Main Street <br /> Pleasanton, CA <br /> <br /> On behalf of l~manuel and Linda Periclakes, owners of the real property referenced <br /> above, the purpose of this letter is to appeal and request additional information <br /> concerning the modifications of the use permit as approved by the planning commission. <br /> <br /> The ownership has lived up to its promise to evict the prior tenant as soon as the <br /> opportunity presented itself. The building is now on the market for lease to a new <br /> qualified te~ara. There are several proposals being contemplated by a variety of prospects <br /> and it is our desire to secure a tenant that will be compatible and complimentary to the <br /> downtown area. Restaurants seem to have the greatest interest in the property. <br /> <br /> With regard to property and zoning in general, how will the use permit/modifications <br /> affect a retail business leasing the property? Will a straight retail or office use be subject <br /> to these conditions? <br /> For example item #4 states that the business owner and property owner will engage <br /> security personnel to the satisfaction of the Pleasamon Police Department and/or <br /> Planning Director ...............This does not seem appropriate for a use other than <br /> restaurant or bar. <br /> <br /> Item #6 requires the business/property owner to maintain the area surrounding the <br /> property. This does not seem equitable. This basically means that this property owner <br /> will be responsible for cleaning sidewalkz, parking lots etc. of all property within 100 feet <br /> of the property boundar/es. Again, this seems unreasonable in the event our tenant is not <br /> of the bar/restaurant nature. Also in the event we do lease to a restaurant does this mean <br /> that this provision requires that business/property owner to maintain all areas within 100 <br /> feet of the property forever, regardless of cause? <br /> <br /> Item #8 requires the "owner" to install a 6 foot chain link fence on a property not <br /> belonging to this property owner. Who will get approval from adjacent property owners <br /> to do this? It should be pointed out that the Union Jack Pub is no longer in business. Is <br /> the subject property owner responsible for all future damage to this fence regardless of <br /> blame or cause? This does not seem reasonable. <br /> <br /> 4125 81aekhawk Plaza Circla, Suite 260, Danville, CA 945~6 925,783-1578 FAX..- 925/738-1563 Emall: Estraface~sbcglobal. net <br /> <br /> <br />